How people use Copilot for Health

Fuente: arXiv
Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Costa-Gomes, Beatriz, Tolmachev, Pavel, Taysom, Eloise, Sounderajah, Viknesh, Richardson, Hannah, Schoenegger, Philipp, Liu, Xiaoxuan, Nour, Matthew M, Spielman, Seth, Way, Samuel F., Shah, Yash, Bhaskar, Michael, Nori, Harsha, Kelly, Christopher, Hames, Peter, Gross, Bay, Suleyman, Mustafa, King, Dominic
Format: Preprint
Veröffentlicht: 2026
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1866911599251423232
author Costa-Gomes, Beatriz
Tolmachev, Pavel
Taysom, Eloise
Sounderajah, Viknesh
Richardson, Hannah
Schoenegger, Philipp
Liu, Xiaoxuan
Nour, Matthew M
Spielman, Seth
Way, Samuel F.
Shah, Yash
Bhaskar, Michael
Nori, Harsha
Kelly, Christopher
Hames, Peter
Gross, Bay
Suleyman, Mustafa
King, Dominic
author_facet Costa-Gomes, Beatriz
Tolmachev, Pavel
Taysom, Eloise
Sounderajah, Viknesh
Richardson, Hannah
Schoenegger, Philipp
Liu, Xiaoxuan
Nour, Matthew M
Spielman, Seth
Way, Samuel F.
Shah, Yash
Bhaskar, Michael
Nori, Harsha
Kelly, Christopher
Hames, Peter
Gross, Bay
Suleyman, Mustafa
King, Dominic
contents We analyze over 500,000 de-identified health-related conversations with Microsoft Copilot from January 2026 to characterize what people ask conversational AI about health. We develop a hierarchical intent taxonomy of 12 primary categories using privacy-preserving LLM-based classification validated against expert human annotation, and apply LLM-driven topic-clustering for prevalent themes within each intent. Using this taxonomy, we characterize the intents and topics behind health queries, identify who these queries are about, and analyze how usage varies by device and time of day. Five findings stand out. First, nearly one in five conversations involve personal symptom assessment or condition discussion, and even the dominant general information category (40%) is concentrated on specific treatments and conditions, suggesting that this is a lower bound on personal health intent. Second, one in seven of these personal health queries concern someone other than the user, such as a child, a parent, a partner, suggesting that conversational AI can be a caregiving tool, not just a personal one. Third, personal queries about symptoms and emotional health queries increase markedly in the evening and nighttime hours, when traditional healthcare is most limited. Fourth, usage diverges sharply by device: mobile concentrates on personal health concerns, while desktop is dominated by professional and academic work. Fifth, a substantial share of queries focuses on navigating healthcare systems such as finding providers, and understanding insurance, highlighting friction in the delivery of existing healthcare. These patterns have direct implications for platform-specific design, safety considerations, and the responsible development of health AI.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2604_15331
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle How people use Copilot for Health
Costa-Gomes, Beatriz
Tolmachev, Pavel
Taysom, Eloise
Sounderajah, Viknesh
Richardson, Hannah
Schoenegger, Philipp
Liu, Xiaoxuan
Nour, Matthew M
Spielman, Seth
Way, Samuel F.
Shah, Yash
Bhaskar, Michael
Nori, Harsha
Kelly, Christopher
Hames, Peter
Gross, Bay
Suleyman, Mustafa
King, Dominic
Human-Computer Interaction
Artificial Intelligence
Computers and Society
We analyze over 500,000 de-identified health-related conversations with Microsoft Copilot from January 2026 to characterize what people ask conversational AI about health. We develop a hierarchical intent taxonomy of 12 primary categories using privacy-preserving LLM-based classification validated against expert human annotation, and apply LLM-driven topic-clustering for prevalent themes within each intent. Using this taxonomy, we characterize the intents and topics behind health queries, identify who these queries are about, and analyze how usage varies by device and time of day. Five findings stand out. First, nearly one in five conversations involve personal symptom assessment or condition discussion, and even the dominant general information category (40%) is concentrated on specific treatments and conditions, suggesting that this is a lower bound on personal health intent. Second, one in seven of these personal health queries concern someone other than the user, such as a child, a parent, a partner, suggesting that conversational AI can be a caregiving tool, not just a personal one. Third, personal queries about symptoms and emotional health queries increase markedly in the evening and nighttime hours, when traditional healthcare is most limited. Fourth, usage diverges sharply by device: mobile concentrates on personal health concerns, while desktop is dominated by professional and academic work. Fifth, a substantial share of queries focuses on navigating healthcare systems such as finding providers, and understanding insurance, highlighting friction in the delivery of existing healthcare. These patterns have direct implications for platform-specific design, safety considerations, and the responsible development of health AI.
title How people use Copilot for Health
topic Human-Computer Interaction
Artificial Intelligence
Computers and Society
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.15331