DR. INFO at the Point of Care: A Prospective Pilot Study of Physician-Perceived Value of an Agentic AI Clinical Assistant
Fuente:
arXiv
Salvato in:
| Autori principali: | , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Natura: | Preprint |
| Pubblicazione: |
2026
|
| Soggetti: | |
| Accesso online: | |
| Tags: |
Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
|
| _version_ | 1866908986606878720 |
|---|---|
| author | Da Silva, Rogerio Corga Romano, Miguel Mendes, Tiago Isidoro, Marta Ravichandran, Sandhanakrishnan Kumar, Shivesh van der Heijden, Michiel Fail, Olivier Gnanapragasam, Valentine Emmanuel |
| author_facet | Da Silva, Rogerio Corga Romano, Miguel Mendes, Tiago Isidoro, Marta Ravichandran, Sandhanakrishnan Kumar, Shivesh van der Heijden, Michiel Fail, Olivier Gnanapragasam, Valentine Emmanuel |
| contents | Background: Clinical documentation and information retrieval consume over half of physicians working hours, contributing to cognitive overload and burnout. While artificial intelligence offers a potential solution, concerns over hallucinations and source reliability have limited adoption at the point of care. This study aimed to evaluate physician-perceived time efficiency, decision-making support, and satisfaction with DR. INFO, an agentic AI clinical assistant, in routine clinical practice.
Methodology: In this prospective, single-arm, pilot feasibility study, 29 physicians and medical students across multiple specialties in Portuguese healthcare institutions used DR. INFO v1.0 over five working days within a two-week period. Outcomes were assessed via daily Likert-scale evaluations (time saving and decision support) and a final Net Promoter Score (NPS). Non-parametric methods were used throughout, with bootstrap confidence intervals (CIs) and sensitivity analysis to address non-response.
Results: Physicians reported high perceived time saving (mean = 4.27/5; 95% CI = 3.97-4.57) and decision support (mean = 4.16/5; 95% CI = 3.86-4.45), with ratings stable across the five-day study window. Among the 16 (55%) participants who completed the final evaluation, the NPS was 81.2, with no detractors; sensitivity analysis indicated an NPS of 44.8 under conservative non-response assumptions.
Conclusions: Physicians across specialties and career stages reported positive perceptions of DR. INFO for both time efficiency and clinical decision support within the study window. These findings are preliminary and should be confirmed in larger, controlled studies that include objective performance measures and independent accuracy verification. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2604_16346 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | DR. INFO at the Point of Care: A Prospective Pilot Study of Physician-Perceived Value of an Agentic AI Clinical Assistant Da Silva, Rogerio Corga Romano, Miguel Mendes, Tiago Isidoro, Marta Ravichandran, Sandhanakrishnan Kumar, Shivesh van der Heijden, Michiel Fail, Olivier Gnanapragasam, Valentine Emmanuel Human-Computer Interaction Computers and Society Background: Clinical documentation and information retrieval consume over half of physicians working hours, contributing to cognitive overload and burnout. While artificial intelligence offers a potential solution, concerns over hallucinations and source reliability have limited adoption at the point of care. This study aimed to evaluate physician-perceived time efficiency, decision-making support, and satisfaction with DR. INFO, an agentic AI clinical assistant, in routine clinical practice. Methodology: In this prospective, single-arm, pilot feasibility study, 29 physicians and medical students across multiple specialties in Portuguese healthcare institutions used DR. INFO v1.0 over five working days within a two-week period. Outcomes were assessed via daily Likert-scale evaluations (time saving and decision support) and a final Net Promoter Score (NPS). Non-parametric methods were used throughout, with bootstrap confidence intervals (CIs) and sensitivity analysis to address non-response. Results: Physicians reported high perceived time saving (mean = 4.27/5; 95% CI = 3.97-4.57) and decision support (mean = 4.16/5; 95% CI = 3.86-4.45), with ratings stable across the five-day study window. Among the 16 (55%) participants who completed the final evaluation, the NPS was 81.2, with no detractors; sensitivity analysis indicated an NPS of 44.8 under conservative non-response assumptions. Conclusions: Physicians across specialties and career stages reported positive perceptions of DR. INFO for both time efficiency and clinical decision support within the study window. These findings are preliminary and should be confirmed in larger, controlled studies that include objective performance measures and independent accuracy verification. |
| title | DR. INFO at the Point of Care: A Prospective Pilot Study of Physician-Perceived Value of an Agentic AI Clinical Assistant |
| topic | Human-Computer Interaction Computers and Society |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.16346 |