Comment on "Angular momentum dynamics of vortex particles in accelerators''
Fuente:
arXiv
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2026
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866911603163660288 |
|---|---|
| author | Baturin, S. S. |
| author_facet | Baturin, S. S. |
| contents | We comment on Ref.[D. Karlovets, D. Grosman, and I. Pavlov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 085002 (2026)], which proposes a BMT-like equation for the mean kinetic orbital angular momentum (OAM) of vortex particles in accelerator fields and draws spin-like conclusions about depolarization, resonances, and control. We show that the proposed closure is not generally valid even at the mean-value level. In the authors' own homogeneous-field model, Eq.(8) already makes $\langle L_z\rangle$ depend on the packet second moment $\langle ρ^2\rangle(τ)$; for an exact family of breathing Landau/LG packets this yields an explicit oscillation incompatible with Eq.(9) except in the nongeneric matched case. Moreover, the Appendix A assumption that mixed correlators are negligible suppresses the transverse kinetic-OAM components themselves, since those correlators are precisely the building blocks of $L_x$ and $L_y$. We also stress that, even if a closed equation for $\langle \hat{\mathbf L}\rangle$ were available, it would still not constitute a transport equation for a vortex quantum state. Mean-OAM transport does not determine OAM spectra, inter-mode coherences, or fidelity. State-level claims therefore require a mode-resolved density-matrix treatment rather than an Ehrenfest equation for a low-order moment. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2604_16544 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Comment on "Angular momentum dynamics of vortex particles in accelerators'' Baturin, S. S. Accelerator Physics High Energy Physics - Phenomenology Optics Quantum Physics We comment on Ref.[D. Karlovets, D. Grosman, and I. Pavlov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 085002 (2026)], which proposes a BMT-like equation for the mean kinetic orbital angular momentum (OAM) of vortex particles in accelerator fields and draws spin-like conclusions about depolarization, resonances, and control. We show that the proposed closure is not generally valid even at the mean-value level. In the authors' own homogeneous-field model, Eq.(8) already makes $\langle L_z\rangle$ depend on the packet second moment $\langle ρ^2\rangle(τ)$; for an exact family of breathing Landau/LG packets this yields an explicit oscillation incompatible with Eq.(9) except in the nongeneric matched case. Moreover, the Appendix A assumption that mixed correlators are negligible suppresses the transverse kinetic-OAM components themselves, since those correlators are precisely the building blocks of $L_x$ and $L_y$. We also stress that, even if a closed equation for $\langle \hat{\mathbf L}\rangle$ were available, it would still not constitute a transport equation for a vortex quantum state. Mean-OAM transport does not determine OAM spectra, inter-mode coherences, or fidelity. State-level claims therefore require a mode-resolved density-matrix treatment rather than an Ehrenfest equation for a low-order moment. |
| title | Comment on "Angular momentum dynamics of vortex particles in accelerators'' |
| topic | Accelerator Physics High Energy Physics - Phenomenology Optics Quantum Physics |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.16544 |