When Misinformation Speaks and Converses: Rethinking Fact-Checking in Audio Platforms

Fuente: arXiv
Enregistré dans:
Détails bibliographiques
Auteurs principaux: Chun, Chaewan, Zhang, Delvin Ce, Lee, Dongwon
Format: Preprint
Publié: 2026
Sujets:
Accès en ligne:
Tags: Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
_version_ 1866915943426293760
author Chun, Chaewan
Zhang, Delvin Ce
Lee, Dongwon
author_facet Chun, Chaewan
Zhang, Delvin Ce
Lee, Dongwon
contents Audio platforms have evolved beyond entertainment. They have become central to public discourse, from podcasts and radio to WhatsApp voice notes and live streams. With millions of shows and hundreds of millions of listeners, audio platforms are now a major channel for misinformation. Yet existing fact-checking pipelines are mostly designed for written claims, overlooking the unique properties of spoken media. We argue that audio misinformation is not merely textual content with transcripts: it is structurally different because it is both spoken - carrying persuasive force through prosody, pacing, and emotion - and conversational - unfolding across turns, speakers, and episodes. These dual properties introduce verification difficulties that traditional methods rarely face. This position paper synthesizes evidence across modalities and platforms, examines datasets and methods, and highlights why existing pipelines fail on audio. We argue that advancing fact-checking requires rethinking verification pipelines around the spoken and conversational realities of audio.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2604_16767
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle When Misinformation Speaks and Converses: Rethinking Fact-Checking in Audio Platforms
Chun, Chaewan
Zhang, Delvin Ce
Lee, Dongwon
Computation and Language
Computers and Society
Audio platforms have evolved beyond entertainment. They have become central to public discourse, from podcasts and radio to WhatsApp voice notes and live streams. With millions of shows and hundreds of millions of listeners, audio platforms are now a major channel for misinformation. Yet existing fact-checking pipelines are mostly designed for written claims, overlooking the unique properties of spoken media. We argue that audio misinformation is not merely textual content with transcripts: it is structurally different because it is both spoken - carrying persuasive force through prosody, pacing, and emotion - and conversational - unfolding across turns, speakers, and episodes. These dual properties introduce verification difficulties that traditional methods rarely face. This position paper synthesizes evidence across modalities and platforms, examines datasets and methods, and highlights why existing pipelines fail on audio. We argue that advancing fact-checking requires rethinking verification pipelines around the spoken and conversational realities of audio.
title When Misinformation Speaks and Converses: Rethinking Fact-Checking in Audio Platforms
topic Computation and Language
Computers and Society
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.16767