Cover Image

When Choices Become Risks: Safety Failures of Large Language Models under Multiple-Choice Constraints

Fuente: arXiv

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Chen, Yuheng, Wu, Zhiyu, Cheng, Bowen, Takahashi, Tetsuro
Format:	Preprint
Published:	2026
Subjects:	Computation and Language
Online Access:	Acceder al recurso
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Similar Items

UBench: Benchmarking Uncertainty in Large Language Models with Multiple Choice Questions
by: Wang, Xunzhi, et al.
Published: (2024)

Large Language Models Are Not Robust Multiple Choice Selectors
by: Zheng, Chujie, et al.
Published: (2023)

Self-Correcting Large Language Models: Generation vs. Multiple Choice
by: Rahmani, Hossein A., et al.
Published: (2025)

When Models Decide and When They Bind: A Two-Stage Computation for Multiple-Choice Question-Answering
by: Wong, Hugh Mee, et al.
Published: (2026)

Multiple Choice Questions: Reasoning Makes Large Language Models (LLMs) More Self-Confident, Especially When They are Wrong
by: Fu, Tairan, et al.
Published: (2025)

Math Multiple Choice Question Generation via Human-Large Language Model Collaboration
by: Lee, Jaewook, et al.
Published: (2024)

Strengthened Symbol Binding Makes Large Language Models Reliable Multiple-Choice Selectors
by: Xue, Mengge, et al.
Published: (2024)

Multiple-Choice Question Generation Using Large Language Models: Methodology and Educator Insights
by: Biancini, Giorgio, et al.
Published: (2025)

Differentiating Choices via Commonality for Multiple-Choice Question Answering
by: Deng, Wenqing, et al.
Published: (2024)

A Study on Large Language Models' Limitations in Multiple-Choice Question Answering
by: Khatun, Aisha, et al.
Published: (2024)

Do Large Language Models Plan Answer Positions? Position Bias in Multiple-Choice Question Generation
by: Tang, Xuemei, et al.
Published: (2026)

Difficulty-Controllable Multiple-Choice Question Generation Using Large Language Models and Direct Preference Optimization
by: Tomikawa, Yuto, et al.
Published: (2025)

Evaluating the Symbol Binding Ability of Large Language Models for Multiple-Choice Questions in Vietnamese General Education
by: Nguyen, Duc-Vu, et al.
Published: (2023)

Reasoning Models are Test Exploiters: Rethinking Multiple-Choice
by: Raman, Narun, et al.
Published: (2025)

Hierarchical Vision-Language Reasoning for Multimodal Multiple-Choice Question Answering
by: Zhou, Ao, et al.
Published: (2025)

Beyond Multiple Choice: Verifiable OpenQA for Robust Vision-Language RFT
by: Liu, Yesheng, et al.
Published: (2025)

Balancing Rigor and Utility: Mitigating Cognitive Biases in Large Language Models for Multiple-Choice Questions
by: Zhong, Hanyang, et al.
Published: (2024)

Exploring Iterative Enhancement for Improving Learnersourced Multiple-Choice Question Explanations with Large Language Models
by: Bao, Qiming, et al.
Published: (2023)

Answer Matching Outperforms Multiple Choice for Language Model Evaluation
by: Chandak, Nikhil, et al.
Published: (2025)

Multiple Choice Learning of Low-Rank Adapters for Language Modeling
by: Letzelter, Victor, et al.
Published: (2025)

MuLTI: Efficient Video-and-Language Understanding with Text-Guided MultiWay-Sampler and Multiple Choice Modeling
by: Xu, Jiaqi, et al.
Published: (2023)

Is Your Large Language Model Knowledgeable or a Choices-Only Cheater?
by: Balepur, Nishant, et al.
Published: (2024)

ViMultiChoice: Toward a Method That Gives Explanation for Multiple-Choice Reading Comprehension in Vietnamese
by: Cao, Trung Tien, et al.
Published: (2026)

Improving Score Reliability of Multiple Choice Benchmarks with Consistency Evaluation and Altered Answer Choices
by: Cavalin, Paulo, et al.
Published: (2025)

How Sensitive Are Safety Benchmarks to Judge Configuration Choices?
by: Zhang, Xinran
Published: (2026)

Cognitively Diverse Multiple-Choice Question Generation: A Hybrid Multi-Agent Framework with Large Language Models
by: Tian, Yu, et al.
Published: (2026)

Generating Plausible Distractors for Multiple-Choice Questions via Student Choice Prediction
by: Lee, Yooseop, et al.
Published: (2025)

The Role of the Availability Heuristic in Multiple-Choice Answering Behaviour
by: Zotos, Leonidas, et al.
Published: (2026)

Multiple-Choice Questions are Efficient and Robust LLM Evaluators
by: Zhang, Ziyin, et al.
Published: (2024)

Large Language Models for Multi-Choice Question Classification of Medical Subjects
by: Ponce-López, Víctor
Published: (2024)

Attributional Safety Failures in Large Language Models under Code-Mixed Perturbations
by: Banerjee, Somnath, et al.
Published: (2025)

Addressing Blind Guessing: Calibration of Selection Bias in Multiple-Choice Question Answering by Video Language Models
by: Loginova, Olga, et al.
Published: (2024)

Biomedical Entity Linking as Multiple Choice Question Answering
by: Lin, Zhenxi, et al.
Published: (2024)

Conformal P-Value in Multiple-Choice Question Answering Tasks with Provable Risk Control
by: Ye, Yuanchang
Published: (2025)

Enhancing Distractor Generation for Multiple-Choice Questions with Retrieval Augmented Pretraining and Knowledge Graph Integration
by: Yu, Han-Cheng, et al.
Published: (2024)

FailureSensorIQ: A Multi-Choice QA Dataset for Understanding Sensor Relationships and Failure Modes
by: Constantinides, Christodoulos, et al.
Published: (2025)

Automated Generation of Challenging Multiple-Choice Questions for Vision Language Model Evaluation
by: Zhang, Yuhui, et al.
Published: (2025)

Pushing the Boundaries of Multiple Choice Evaluation to One Hundred Options
by: Lee, Nahyun, et al.
Published: (2026)

Bridging the Knowledge-Prediction Gap in LLMs on Multiple-Choice Questions
by: Park, Yoonah, et al.
Published: (2025)

Test-Time Reasoners Are Strategic Multiple-Choice Test-Takers
by: Balepur, Nishant, et al.
Published: (2025)