Safety-Aware AoI Scheduling for LEO Satellite-Assisted Autonomous Driving
Fuente:
arXiv
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2026
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866911605546024960 |
|---|---|
| author | Sun, Kangkang He, Junyi Liu, Juntong Chen, Xiuzhen Li, Jianhua Guo, Minyi |
| author_facet | Sun, Kangkang He, Junyi Liu, Juntong Chen, Xiuzhen Li, Jianhua Guo, Minyi |
| contents | Autonomous platoons traversing infrastructure gaps increasingly depend on LEO satellite backhaul for safety-critical updates, yet no existing framework jointly addresses compound Doppler from simultaneous satellite and vehicle motion, sub-slot handover outages that exceed collision-alert deadlines, and heterogeneous freshness requirements across three vehicular priority classes. The core challenge is a \emph{timescale mismatch}: coarse control slots hide sub-slot outages, which makes both AoI spike analysis and safety verification ill-posed. Ping-pong handover oscillations further compound AoI cost in a way that purely reactive schedulers cannot mitigate. We address these challenges through a unified framework that couples a two-timescale AoI model with tiered time-average safety constraints enforced by virtual queues. A closed-form ping-pong AoI envelope reveals that cumulative penalty grows quadratically in oscillation length, analytically justifying oscillation suppression as the highest-leverage safety mechanism. The resulting drift-plus-penalty template is instantiated as SafeScale-MATD3 with proactive handover timing and multi-task dual-critic MARL. A key finding is that suppressing brief but repeated ping-pong oscillations yields larger safety returns than shortening any single outage, and that tick-level AoI accounting is a necessary condition for verifiable collision-alert guarantees under LEO handovers. Simulations show that SafeScale-MATD3 is the only method satisfying the strict 1 % collision-alert violation budget, reducing violation rate by 4 to 5.5 times versus baselines, while achieving 35 % lower collision-alert AoI and strict Pareto dominance on the energy and freshness tradeoff. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2604_17281 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Safety-Aware AoI Scheduling for LEO Satellite-Assisted Autonomous Driving Sun, Kangkang He, Junyi Liu, Juntong Chen, Xiuzhen Li, Jianhua Guo, Minyi Networking and Internet Architecture F.2.2; C.2.1 Autonomous platoons traversing infrastructure gaps increasingly depend on LEO satellite backhaul for safety-critical updates, yet no existing framework jointly addresses compound Doppler from simultaneous satellite and vehicle motion, sub-slot handover outages that exceed collision-alert deadlines, and heterogeneous freshness requirements across three vehicular priority classes. The core challenge is a \emph{timescale mismatch}: coarse control slots hide sub-slot outages, which makes both AoI spike analysis and safety verification ill-posed. Ping-pong handover oscillations further compound AoI cost in a way that purely reactive schedulers cannot mitigate. We address these challenges through a unified framework that couples a two-timescale AoI model with tiered time-average safety constraints enforced by virtual queues. A closed-form ping-pong AoI envelope reveals that cumulative penalty grows quadratically in oscillation length, analytically justifying oscillation suppression as the highest-leverage safety mechanism. The resulting drift-plus-penalty template is instantiated as SafeScale-MATD3 with proactive handover timing and multi-task dual-critic MARL. A key finding is that suppressing brief but repeated ping-pong oscillations yields larger safety returns than shortening any single outage, and that tick-level AoI accounting is a necessary condition for verifiable collision-alert guarantees under LEO handovers. Simulations show that SafeScale-MATD3 is the only method satisfying the strict 1 % collision-alert violation budget, reducing violation rate by 4 to 5.5 times versus baselines, while achieving 35 % lower collision-alert AoI and strict Pareto dominance on the energy and freshness tradeoff. |
| title | Safety-Aware AoI Scheduling for LEO Satellite-Assisted Autonomous Driving |
| topic | Networking and Internet Architecture F.2.2; C.2.1 |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.17281 |