More Than Meets the Eye: Measuring the Semiotic Gap in Vision-Language Models via Semantic Anchorage
Fuente:
arXiv
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2026
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866913045201027072 |
|---|---|
| author | He, Wei |
| author_facet | He, Wei |
| contents | Vision-Language Models (VLMs) excel at photorealistic generation, yet often struggle to represent abstract meaning such as idiomatic interpretations of noun compounds. To study whether high visual fidelity interferes with idiomatic compositionality under visual abstraction, we introduce DIVA, a controlled benchmark that replaces high-fidelity visual detail with schematic iconicity by generating paired, sense-anchored visualizations for literal and idiomatic readings. We further propose Semantic Alignment Gap ($Δ$), an architecture-agnostic metric that quantifies divergence between literal and idiomatic visual grounding. We additionally introduce a directional signed bias $b(t)$ to separately measure the direction and strength of literal preference. Evaluating 8 recent VLMs, we reveal a consistent Literal Superiority Bias: model scale alone does not resolve literal preference, and increased visual fidelity is associated with weaker symbolic alignment, suggesting cognitive interference from hyper-realistic imagery. Our findings suggest that improving compositional understanding requires iconographic abstraction of visual input and anchoring interpretation and generation in intended meaning. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2604_17354 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | More Than Meets the Eye: Measuring the Semiotic Gap in Vision-Language Models via Semantic Anchorage He, Wei Computation and Language Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition I.2.7; I.2.10 Vision-Language Models (VLMs) excel at photorealistic generation, yet often struggle to represent abstract meaning such as idiomatic interpretations of noun compounds. To study whether high visual fidelity interferes with idiomatic compositionality under visual abstraction, we introduce DIVA, a controlled benchmark that replaces high-fidelity visual detail with schematic iconicity by generating paired, sense-anchored visualizations for literal and idiomatic readings. We further propose Semantic Alignment Gap ($Δ$), an architecture-agnostic metric that quantifies divergence between literal and idiomatic visual grounding. We additionally introduce a directional signed bias $b(t)$ to separately measure the direction and strength of literal preference. Evaluating 8 recent VLMs, we reveal a consistent Literal Superiority Bias: model scale alone does not resolve literal preference, and increased visual fidelity is associated with weaker symbolic alignment, suggesting cognitive interference from hyper-realistic imagery. Our findings suggest that improving compositional understanding requires iconographic abstraction of visual input and anchoring interpretation and generation in intended meaning. |
| title | More Than Meets the Eye: Measuring the Semiotic Gap in Vision-Language Models via Semantic Anchorage |
| topic | Computation and Language Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition I.2.7; I.2.10 |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.17354 |