When Vision-Language Models Judge Without Seeing: Exposing Informativeness Bias

Fuente: arXiv
Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Zou, Xiaohan, Sridhar, Roshan, Safarzadeh, Mohammadtaher, Roth, Dan
Format: Preprint
Veröffentlicht: 2026
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1866914489399508992
author Zou, Xiaohan
Sridhar, Roshan
Safarzadeh, Mohammadtaher
Roth, Dan
author_facet Zou, Xiaohan
Sridhar, Roshan
Safarzadeh, Mohammadtaher
Roth, Dan
contents The reliability of VLM-as-a-Judge is critical for the automatic evaluation of vision-language models (VLMs). Despite recent progress, our analysis reveals that VLM-as-a-Judge often pays limited attention to the image when making decisions. Instead, they often blindly favor the more informative answer, even when they can recognize it conflicts with the image content. We call this problem informativeness bias, which significantly undermines judge reliability. To address it, we propose BIRCH (Balanced Informativeness and CoRrectness with a Truthful AnCHor), a judging paradigm that first corrects inconsistencies with the image content in candidate answers, and then compares the answers against this corrected version. This shifts the judge's focus from informativeness to image-grounded correctness. Experiments on multiple models and benchmarks show that BIRCH reduces informativeness bias by up to 17%, resulting in performance gains of up to 9.8%. Our work reveals an overlooked but fundamental flaw in current VLM-as-a-Judge systems and highlights the need for more principled designs.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2604_17768
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle When Vision-Language Models Judge Without Seeing: Exposing Informativeness Bias
Zou, Xiaohan
Sridhar, Roshan
Safarzadeh, Mohammadtaher
Roth, Dan
Artificial Intelligence
The reliability of VLM-as-a-Judge is critical for the automatic evaluation of vision-language models (VLMs). Despite recent progress, our analysis reveals that VLM-as-a-Judge often pays limited attention to the image when making decisions. Instead, they often blindly favor the more informative answer, even when they can recognize it conflicts with the image content. We call this problem informativeness bias, which significantly undermines judge reliability. To address it, we propose BIRCH (Balanced Informativeness and CoRrectness with a Truthful AnCHor), a judging paradigm that first corrects inconsistencies with the image content in candidate answers, and then compares the answers against this corrected version. This shifts the judge's focus from informativeness to image-grounded correctness. Experiments on multiple models and benchmarks show that BIRCH reduces informativeness bias by up to 17%, resulting in performance gains of up to 9.8%. Our work reveals an overlooked but fundamental flaw in current VLM-as-a-Judge systems and highlights the need for more principled designs.
title When Vision-Language Models Judge Without Seeing: Exposing Informativeness Bias
topic Artificial Intelligence
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.17768