It's all in your head -- fine-tuning arguments do not require aleatoric uncertainty

Fuente: arXiv
Salvato in:
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autore principale: Fowlie, Andrew
Natura: Preprint
Pubblicazione: 2026
Soggetti:
Accesso online:
Tags: Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
_version_ 1866910149834178560
author Fowlie, Andrew
author_facet Fowlie, Andrew
contents Prompted by misconceptions in the recent literature, we review the justifications for naturalness arguments and Occam's razor found in Bayesian statistics. We discuss the automatic Occam's razor that emerges in Bayesian formalism, bringing together points of view from diverse fields, including statistics, social sciences, physics and machine learning. In pedagogical calculations, we demonstrate that this automatic razor disfavors unnatural models in which predictions must be fine-tuned to agree with observation.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2604_18656
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle It's all in your head -- fine-tuning arguments do not require aleatoric uncertainty
Fowlie, Andrew
History and Philosophy of Physics
High Energy Physics - Phenomenology
Data Analysis, Statistics and Probability
Prompted by misconceptions in the recent literature, we review the justifications for naturalness arguments and Occam's razor found in Bayesian statistics. We discuss the automatic Occam's razor that emerges in Bayesian formalism, bringing together points of view from diverse fields, including statistics, social sciences, physics and machine learning. In pedagogical calculations, we demonstrate that this automatic razor disfavors unnatural models in which predictions must be fine-tuned to agree with observation.
title It's all in your head -- fine-tuning arguments do not require aleatoric uncertainty
topic History and Philosophy of Physics
High Energy Physics - Phenomenology
Data Analysis, Statistics and Probability
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18656