Students Know AI Should Not Replace Thinking, but How Do They Regulate It? The TACO Framework for Human-AI Cognitive Partnership
Fuente:
arXiv
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2026
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866908981171060736 |
|---|---|
| author | Chan, Cecilia Ka Yuk |
| author_facet | Chan, Cecilia Ka Yuk |
| contents | As generative artificial intelligence becomes increasingly embedded in educational practice, a central concern is whether students use AI as cognitive support or as a substitute for thinking. Prior research shows that learners recognise this boundary conceptually and acknowledge that "AI should not replace thinking." However, whether such awareness translates into structured regulation during actual AI use remains unclear.
Drawing on data from Hong Kong secondary students, this study examines how learners perceive their management of the boundary between assistance and outsourcing in practice. Findings show that awareness did not consistently translate into regulation; ethical belief did not necessarily lead to strategic execution; and conceptual endorsement did not guarantee operational behaviour.
These findings suggest that the challenge is not teaching students that AI should not replace thinking, as they already know this, but providing them with structured mechanisms to regulate how AI is used within learning processes. In response, the study introduces the TACO framework (Think-Ask-Check-Own), a process-oriented model designed to operationalise the boundary between cognitive support and cognitive substitution. By shifting attention from ethical awareness to cognitive regulation, the study contributes a learner-grounded approach to sustaining AI as a dynamic cognitive partner in education. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2604_18737 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Students Know AI Should Not Replace Thinking, but How Do They Regulate It? The TACO Framework for Human-AI Cognitive Partnership Chan, Cecilia Ka Yuk Computers and Society Human-Computer Interaction As generative artificial intelligence becomes increasingly embedded in educational practice, a central concern is whether students use AI as cognitive support or as a substitute for thinking. Prior research shows that learners recognise this boundary conceptually and acknowledge that "AI should not replace thinking." However, whether such awareness translates into structured regulation during actual AI use remains unclear. Drawing on data from Hong Kong secondary students, this study examines how learners perceive their management of the boundary between assistance and outsourcing in practice. Findings show that awareness did not consistently translate into regulation; ethical belief did not necessarily lead to strategic execution; and conceptual endorsement did not guarantee operational behaviour. These findings suggest that the challenge is not teaching students that AI should not replace thinking, as they already know this, but providing them with structured mechanisms to regulate how AI is used within learning processes. In response, the study introduces the TACO framework (Think-Ask-Check-Own), a process-oriented model designed to operationalise the boundary between cognitive support and cognitive substitution. By shifting attention from ethical awareness to cognitive regulation, the study contributes a learner-grounded approach to sustaining AI as a dynamic cognitive partner in education. |
| title | Students Know AI Should Not Replace Thinking, but How Do They Regulate It? The TACO Framework for Human-AI Cognitive Partnership |
| topic | Computers and Society Human-Computer Interaction |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18737 |