Relational AI in Education: Reciprocity, Participatory Design, and Indigenous Worldviews
Fuente:
arXiv
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2026
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| _version_ | 1866908982920085504 |
|---|---|
| author | Martinez-Maldonado, Roberto Echeverria, Vanessa Hawes, Jenna Kim, YJ Maddigan, Zara Milesi, Mikaela Nelson, Todd Tsai, Yi-Shan |
| author_facet | Martinez-Maldonado, Roberto Echeverria, Vanessa Hawes, Jenna Kim, YJ Maddigan, Zara Milesi, Mikaela Nelson, Todd Tsai, Yi-Shan |
| contents | Education is not merely the transmission of information or the optimisation of individual performance; it is a fundamentally social, constructive, and relational practice. However, recent advances in generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) increasingly emphasise efficiency, automation, and individualised assistance, risking the weakening of relational learning processes. Despite growing adoption, AI in education (AIED) research has yet to fully articulate how AI can be designed in ways that sustain the social and ecological relationships through which learning occurs. In this paper, we re-centre education as relational and frame learner-AI interactions as context-specific relationships with clearly defined purposes and boundaries, rather than positioning them as substitutes for, or replacements of, human interaction. Grounded in participatory design practices and inspired by Indigenous worldviews (including Aboriginal Australian, Native American, and Mesoamerican traditions) that foreground reciprocity and relational accountability, we argue that meaningful educational AI should support learning with others rather than replace them. We advance this perspective by: i) conceptualising AIED as a relational design problem grounded in reciprocity; ii) articulating key tensions introduced by GenAI in education; and iii) outlining design directions that expand the AIED design space toward reciprocity, including when not to use AI, how to define pedagogical boundaries, and how to support responsible uses of AIED innovations that sustain communities and natural environments. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2604_19099 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Relational AI in Education: Reciprocity, Participatory Design, and Indigenous Worldviews Martinez-Maldonado, Roberto Echeverria, Vanessa Hawes, Jenna Kim, YJ Maddigan, Zara Milesi, Mikaela Nelson, Todd Tsai, Yi-Shan Human-Computer Interaction Artificial Intelligence Education is not merely the transmission of information or the optimisation of individual performance; it is a fundamentally social, constructive, and relational practice. However, recent advances in generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) increasingly emphasise efficiency, automation, and individualised assistance, risking the weakening of relational learning processes. Despite growing adoption, AI in education (AIED) research has yet to fully articulate how AI can be designed in ways that sustain the social and ecological relationships through which learning occurs. In this paper, we re-centre education as relational and frame learner-AI interactions as context-specific relationships with clearly defined purposes and boundaries, rather than positioning them as substitutes for, or replacements of, human interaction. Grounded in participatory design practices and inspired by Indigenous worldviews (including Aboriginal Australian, Native American, and Mesoamerican traditions) that foreground reciprocity and relational accountability, we argue that meaningful educational AI should support learning with others rather than replace them. We advance this perspective by: i) conceptualising AIED as a relational design problem grounded in reciprocity; ii) articulating key tensions introduced by GenAI in education; and iii) outlining design directions that expand the AIED design space toward reciprocity, including when not to use AI, how to define pedagogical boundaries, and how to support responsible uses of AIED innovations that sustain communities and natural environments. |
| title | Relational AI in Education: Reciprocity, Participatory Design, and Indigenous Worldviews |
| topic | Human-Computer Interaction Artificial Intelligence |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.19099 |