A hierarchy of edge-weight symmetries in perfect matchings
Fuente:
arXiv
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2026
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866911613930438656 |
|---|---|
| author | Bérczi, Kristóf Csaplár, Viktor Yamaguchi, Yutaro |
| author_facet | Bérczi, Kristóf Csaplár, Viktor Yamaguchi, Yutaro |
| contents | Motivated by the exact weight perfect matching problem and recent parameterized algorithms for finding an $\ell$-th smallest perfect matching, we study structural properties of edge-weight symmetries in graphs. Recent work by El Maalouly et al. (ESA 2025) showed that excluding all perfect matchings whose weight is at most the $(\ell - 1)$-th smallest possible value in the graph requires fixing at most $2(\ell-1)$ edges in non-bipartite graphs and at most $\ell-1$ edges in bipartite graphs. A natural open question is whether fixing a single edge is always sufficient to shift the extreme (minimum or maximum) weight of a perfect matching when the global minimum and maximum weights differ.
To address this, we define and analyze a hierarchy of progressively weaker edge-weight properties: node-induced weights, even walk and cycle symmetries, perfect matching equality, and the edge min-max property. We derive a basic hierarchy among these conditions and show that they become equivalent in bipartite graphs. For general graphs, we provide tight structural characterizations, based on block and tight cut decompositions, under which even cycle symmetry and perfect matching equality force node-induced weights.
Finally, we resolve the motivating open question in the negative by constructing a matching-covered non-bipartite graph that satisfies the edge min-max property (every edge is contained in a minimum-weight perfect matching and a maximum-weight one) but violates perfect matching equality (all perfect matchings have the same weight). This counterexample shows that a single edge is not always sufficient to eliminate all minimum-weight or maximum-weight perfect matchings, thereby proving the tightness of the $2(\ell-1)$ bound for $\ell=2$. We also discuss extensions of this framework to $b$-factors and arborescences. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2604_20009 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | A hierarchy of edge-weight symmetries in perfect matchings Bérczi, Kristóf Csaplár, Viktor Yamaguchi, Yutaro Combinatorics Discrete Mathematics Motivated by the exact weight perfect matching problem and recent parameterized algorithms for finding an $\ell$-th smallest perfect matching, we study structural properties of edge-weight symmetries in graphs. Recent work by El Maalouly et al. (ESA 2025) showed that excluding all perfect matchings whose weight is at most the $(\ell - 1)$-th smallest possible value in the graph requires fixing at most $2(\ell-1)$ edges in non-bipartite graphs and at most $\ell-1$ edges in bipartite graphs. A natural open question is whether fixing a single edge is always sufficient to shift the extreme (minimum or maximum) weight of a perfect matching when the global minimum and maximum weights differ. To address this, we define and analyze a hierarchy of progressively weaker edge-weight properties: node-induced weights, even walk and cycle symmetries, perfect matching equality, and the edge min-max property. We derive a basic hierarchy among these conditions and show that they become equivalent in bipartite graphs. For general graphs, we provide tight structural characterizations, based on block and tight cut decompositions, under which even cycle symmetry and perfect matching equality force node-induced weights. Finally, we resolve the motivating open question in the negative by constructing a matching-covered non-bipartite graph that satisfies the edge min-max property (every edge is contained in a minimum-weight perfect matching and a maximum-weight one) but violates perfect matching equality (all perfect matchings have the same weight). This counterexample shows that a single edge is not always sufficient to eliminate all minimum-weight or maximum-weight perfect matchings, thereby proving the tightness of the $2(\ell-1)$ bound for $\ell=2$. We also discuss extensions of this framework to $b$-factors and arborescences. |
| title | A hierarchy of edge-weight symmetries in perfect matchings |
| topic | Combinatorics Discrete Mathematics |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.20009 |