Kitchen Sink Anomaly Detection
Fuente:
arXiv
Enregistré dans:
| Auteurs principaux: | , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Publié: |
2026
|
| Sujets: | |
| Accès en ligne: | |
| Tags: |
Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
|
| _version_ | 1866910158582448128 |
|---|---|
| author | Das, Ranit Hein, Marie Kasieczka, Gregor Krämer, Michael Lang, Lukas Mastandrea, Radha Moureaux, Louis Mück, Alexander Shih, David |
| author_facet | Das, Ranit Hein, Marie Kasieczka, Gregor Krämer, Michael Lang, Lukas Mastandrea, Radha Moureaux, Louis Mück, Alexander Shih, David |
| contents | An enormous amount of R&D effort has resulted in many new resonant anomaly detection methods being proposed in recent years. However, the vast majority of previous R&D studies have suffered from two limitations: they have focused on a very small set of simulated signal benchmark models; and they have either used small sets of carefully crafted high-level jet substructure observables, which can be highly performant but are prone to model dependence, or the full collider event phase space, which is more agnostic but suffers from reduced sensitivity. In this work, we address both limitations: we formulate a number of new simulated signal benchmarks, which we make publicly available in a format fully compatible with the LHCO R&D benchmark; and we explore a high-level, yet highly agnostic, observable set consisting of Energy Flow Polynomials in addition to the usual subjettiness variables. We evaluate this "kitchen sink" observable set for both an idealized anomaly detector and the CWoLa hunting task, along with three baseline observable sets (the Baseline LHC Olympics set, subjettiness observables, and Energy Flow Polynomials). We find that our kitchen sink approach is the most sensitive to a broad range of signal types. Furthermore, we show that an attribute bagging variant, in which each ensemble member is trained on a random subset of substructure observables, yields comparable anomaly detection performance while significantly reducing training cost. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2604_20965 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Kitchen Sink Anomaly Detection Das, Ranit Hein, Marie Kasieczka, Gregor Krämer, Michael Lang, Lukas Mastandrea, Radha Moureaux, Louis Mück, Alexander Shih, David High Energy Physics - Phenomenology High Energy Physics - Experiment Data Analysis, Statistics and Probability An enormous amount of R&D effort has resulted in many new resonant anomaly detection methods being proposed in recent years. However, the vast majority of previous R&D studies have suffered from two limitations: they have focused on a very small set of simulated signal benchmark models; and they have either used small sets of carefully crafted high-level jet substructure observables, which can be highly performant but are prone to model dependence, or the full collider event phase space, which is more agnostic but suffers from reduced sensitivity. In this work, we address both limitations: we formulate a number of new simulated signal benchmarks, which we make publicly available in a format fully compatible with the LHCO R&D benchmark; and we explore a high-level, yet highly agnostic, observable set consisting of Energy Flow Polynomials in addition to the usual subjettiness variables. We evaluate this "kitchen sink" observable set for both an idealized anomaly detector and the CWoLa hunting task, along with three baseline observable sets (the Baseline LHC Olympics set, subjettiness observables, and Energy Flow Polynomials). We find that our kitchen sink approach is the most sensitive to a broad range of signal types. Furthermore, we show that an attribute bagging variant, in which each ensemble member is trained on a random subset of substructure observables, yields comparable anomaly detection performance while significantly reducing training cost. |
| title | Kitchen Sink Anomaly Detection |
| topic | High Energy Physics - Phenomenology High Energy Physics - Experiment Data Analysis, Statistics and Probability |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.20965 |