Temporal Taskification in Streaming Continual Learning: A Source of Evaluation Instability

Fuente: arXiv
Enregistré dans:
Détails bibliographiques
Auteurs principaux: Filat, Nicolae, Hussain, Ahmed, Kalogiannis, Konstantinos, Burceanu, Elena
Format: Preprint
Publié: 2026
Sujets:
Accès en ligne:
Tags: Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
_version_ 1866918464661225472
author Filat, Nicolae
Hussain, Ahmed
Kalogiannis, Konstantinos
Burceanu, Elena
author_facet Filat, Nicolae
Hussain, Ahmed
Kalogiannis, Konstantinos
Burceanu, Elena
contents Streaming Continual Learning (CL) typically converts a continuous stream into a sequence of discrete tasks through temporal partitioning. We argue that this temporal taskification step is not a neutral preprocessing choice, but a structural component of evaluation: different valid splits of the same stream can induce different CL regimes and therefore different benchmark conclusions. To study this effect, we introduce a taskification-level framework based on plasticity and stability profiles, a profile distance between taskifications, and Boundary-Profile Sensitivity (BPS), which diagnoses how strongly small boundary perturbations alter the induced regime before any CL model is trained. We evaluate continual finetuning, Experience Replay, Elastic Weight Consolidation, and Learning without Forgetting on network traffic forecasting with CESNET-Timeseries24, keeping the stream, model, and training budget fixed while varying only the temporal taskification. Across 9-, 30-, and 44-day splits, we observe substantial changes in forecasting error, forgetting, and backward transfer, showing that taskification alone can materially affect CL evaluation. We further find that shorter taskifications induce noisier distribution-level patterns, larger structural distances, and higher BPS, indicating greater sensitivity to boundary perturbations. These results show that benchmark conclusions in streaming CL depend not only on the learner and the data stream, but also on how that stream is taskified, motivating temporal taskification as a first-class evaluation variable.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2604_21930
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Temporal Taskification in Streaming Continual Learning: A Source of Evaluation Instability
Filat, Nicolae
Hussain, Ahmed
Kalogiannis, Konstantinos
Burceanu, Elena
Machine Learning
68T05
I.2.6
Streaming Continual Learning (CL) typically converts a continuous stream into a sequence of discrete tasks through temporal partitioning. We argue that this temporal taskification step is not a neutral preprocessing choice, but a structural component of evaluation: different valid splits of the same stream can induce different CL regimes and therefore different benchmark conclusions. To study this effect, we introduce a taskification-level framework based on plasticity and stability profiles, a profile distance between taskifications, and Boundary-Profile Sensitivity (BPS), which diagnoses how strongly small boundary perturbations alter the induced regime before any CL model is trained. We evaluate continual finetuning, Experience Replay, Elastic Weight Consolidation, and Learning without Forgetting on network traffic forecasting with CESNET-Timeseries24, keeping the stream, model, and training budget fixed while varying only the temporal taskification. Across 9-, 30-, and 44-day splits, we observe substantial changes in forecasting error, forgetting, and backward transfer, showing that taskification alone can materially affect CL evaluation. We further find that shorter taskifications induce noisier distribution-level patterns, larger structural distances, and higher BPS, indicating greater sensitivity to boundary perturbations. These results show that benchmark conclusions in streaming CL depend not only on the learner and the data stream, but also on how that stream is taskified, motivating temporal taskification as a first-class evaluation variable.
title Temporal Taskification in Streaming Continual Learning: A Source of Evaluation Instability
topic Machine Learning
68T05
I.2.6
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21930