Quantifying Interface Procedure Coupling Risks in Digital Nuclear Control Rooms: An Event Based Human Reliability Assessment

Fuente: arXiv
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xiao, Xingyu, Xiao, Mingwei, Li, Hongbo, Liang, Jingang, Tong, Jiejuan, Wang, Haitao
Format: Preprint
Published: 2026
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866917431632461824
author Xiao, Xingyu
Xiao, Mingwei
Li, Hongbo
Liang, Jingang
Tong, Jiejuan
Wang, Haitao
author_facet Xiao, Xingyu
Xiao, Mingwei
Li, Hongbo
Liang, Jingang
Tong, Jiejuan
Wang, Haitao
contents Digitalization has fundamentally transformed human system interaction in nuclear main control rooms, yet the quantitative mechanisms by which interfaces amplify procedural risks remain insufficiently understood. This study presents a systematic assessment of interface procedure coupling based on real operational events collected from 2021 to 2025 in a modern nuclear power plant. A reusable three dimensional labeling framework and a four factor interface mechanism model are developed to characterize layout, semantic, mismatch, and labeling deficiencies. Results show that interface issues function as a significant risk amplifier. A total of 42.6 percent of events involved interface deficiencies, and their presence more than doubled the likelihood of procedural deviation. Machine learning interpretation further reveals that composite interface procedure coupling, particularly driven by semantic mismatches and layout induced traps, is the dominant contributor to coupled failures. Simulator based validation confirms that semantic confusion accounts for 27.3 percent of interface induced errors, with overall error patterns consistent with historical data. The study provides a data driven HRA workflow for early vulnerability identification in digital control rooms and proposes a systematic framework for interface procedure semantic alignment to support risk informed design and verification.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2604_21932
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Quantifying Interface Procedure Coupling Risks in Digital Nuclear Control Rooms: An Event Based Human Reliability Assessment
Xiao, Xingyu
Xiao, Mingwei
Li, Hongbo
Liang, Jingang
Tong, Jiejuan
Wang, Haitao
Human-Computer Interaction
Software Engineering
Digitalization has fundamentally transformed human system interaction in nuclear main control rooms, yet the quantitative mechanisms by which interfaces amplify procedural risks remain insufficiently understood. This study presents a systematic assessment of interface procedure coupling based on real operational events collected from 2021 to 2025 in a modern nuclear power plant. A reusable three dimensional labeling framework and a four factor interface mechanism model are developed to characterize layout, semantic, mismatch, and labeling deficiencies. Results show that interface issues function as a significant risk amplifier. A total of 42.6 percent of events involved interface deficiencies, and their presence more than doubled the likelihood of procedural deviation. Machine learning interpretation further reveals that composite interface procedure coupling, particularly driven by semantic mismatches and layout induced traps, is the dominant contributor to coupled failures. Simulator based validation confirms that semantic confusion accounts for 27.3 percent of interface induced errors, with overall error patterns consistent with historical data. The study provides a data driven HRA workflow for early vulnerability identification in digital control rooms and proposes a systematic framework for interface procedure semantic alignment to support risk informed design and verification.
title Quantifying Interface Procedure Coupling Risks in Digital Nuclear Control Rooms: An Event Based Human Reliability Assessment
topic Human-Computer Interaction
Software Engineering
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21932