Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2026
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.22513 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866915955189219328 |
|---|---|
| author | Protogeros, Ioannis Asadli, Rufat Hoffman, Benjamin Vanbever, Laurent |
| author_facet | Protogeros, Ioannis Asadli, Rufat Hoffman, Benjamin Vanbever, Laurent |
| contents | There is a rapidly growing interest in using Large Language Models (LLMs) to automate complex network operations, but their reliable adoption requires rigorous assessment of their effectiveness and safety. Existing benchmarks do not address whether LLMs can successfully resolve errors in large-scale, interdependent network configurations without introducing new disruptions. Developing such a benchmark is challenging: scenarios must be diverse and increasingly complex, yet their evaluation must be straightforward and meaningful. In this paper, we present Cornetto, the first benchmark to evaluate LLM-driven network configuration repair functionally and at scale. Cornetto features a generation pipeline that synthesizes representative and plausible misconfiguration scenarios, coupled with an evaluation framework that uses formal verification to assess functional correctness of proposed fixes against ground-truth specifications. Using this pipeline, we synthesize a dataset of 231 problems for fixing configurations across varying network topologies (20--754 nodes) and diverse protocols. We evaluate 9 state-of-the-art LLMs and find that while they show promise, they often introduce regressions and their performance degrades at scale. Our results indicate that reliable LLM-powered network automation requires integrating LLMs into iterative workflows guided by formal verification. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2604_22513 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Benchmarking LLM-Driven Network Configuration Repair Protogeros, Ioannis Asadli, Rufat Hoffman, Benjamin Vanbever, Laurent Networking and Internet Architecture There is a rapidly growing interest in using Large Language Models (LLMs) to automate complex network operations, but their reliable adoption requires rigorous assessment of their effectiveness and safety. Existing benchmarks do not address whether LLMs can successfully resolve errors in large-scale, interdependent network configurations without introducing new disruptions. Developing such a benchmark is challenging: scenarios must be diverse and increasingly complex, yet their evaluation must be straightforward and meaningful. In this paper, we present Cornetto, the first benchmark to evaluate LLM-driven network configuration repair functionally and at scale. Cornetto features a generation pipeline that synthesizes representative and plausible misconfiguration scenarios, coupled with an evaluation framework that uses formal verification to assess functional correctness of proposed fixes against ground-truth specifications. Using this pipeline, we synthesize a dataset of 231 problems for fixing configurations across varying network topologies (20--754 nodes) and diverse protocols. We evaluate 9 state-of-the-art LLMs and find that while they show promise, they often introduce regressions and their performance degrades at scale. Our results indicate that reliable LLM-powered network automation requires integrating LLMs into iterative workflows guided by formal verification. |
| title | Benchmarking LLM-Driven Network Configuration Repair |
| topic | Networking and Internet Architecture |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.22513 |