Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yosef, Erez, Anschel, Oron, Hakimi, Shunit Haviv, Gendler, Asaf, Botach, Adam, Berman, Nimrod, Kviatkovsky, Igor
Format: Preprint
Published: 2026
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.22597
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866914504932065280
author Yosef, Erez
Anschel, Oron
Hakimi, Shunit Haviv
Gendler, Asaf
Botach, Adam
Berman, Nimrod
Kviatkovsky, Igor
author_facet Yosef, Erez
Anschel, Oron
Hakimi, Shunit Haviv
Gendler, Asaf
Botach, Adam
Berman, Nimrod
Kviatkovsky, Igor
contents Recent advancements in large language models have led to significant improvements across various tasks, including mathematical reasoning, which is used to assess models' intelligence in logical reasoning and problem-solving. Models are evaluated on mathematical reasoning benchmarks by verifying the correctness of the final answer against a ground truth answer. A common approach for this verification is based on symbolic mathematics comparison, which fails to generalize across diverse mathematical representations and solution formats. In this work, we offer a robust and flexible alternative to rule-based symbolic mathematics comparison. We propose an LLM-based evaluation framework for evaluating model-generated answers, enabling accurate evaluation across diverse mathematical representations and answer formats. We present failure cases of symbolic evaluation in two popular frameworks, Lighteval and SimpleRL, and compare them to our approach, demonstrating clear improvements over commonly used methods. Our framework enables more reliable evaluation and benchmarking, leading to more accurate performance monitoring, which is important for advancing mathematical problem-solving and intelligent systems.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2604_22597
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Rethinking Math Reasoning Evaluation: A Robust LLM-as-a-Judge Framework Beyond Symbolic Rigidity
Yosef, Erez
Anschel, Oron
Hakimi, Shunit Haviv
Gendler, Asaf
Botach, Adam
Berman, Nimrod
Kviatkovsky, Igor
Artificial Intelligence
Recent advancements in large language models have led to significant improvements across various tasks, including mathematical reasoning, which is used to assess models' intelligence in logical reasoning and problem-solving. Models are evaluated on mathematical reasoning benchmarks by verifying the correctness of the final answer against a ground truth answer. A common approach for this verification is based on symbolic mathematics comparison, which fails to generalize across diverse mathematical representations and solution formats. In this work, we offer a robust and flexible alternative to rule-based symbolic mathematics comparison. We propose an LLM-based evaluation framework for evaluating model-generated answers, enabling accurate evaluation across diverse mathematical representations and answer formats. We present failure cases of symbolic evaluation in two popular frameworks, Lighteval and SimpleRL, and compare them to our approach, demonstrating clear improvements over commonly used methods. Our framework enables more reliable evaluation and benchmarking, leading to more accurate performance monitoring, which is important for advancing mathematical problem-solving and intelligent systems.
title Rethinking Math Reasoning Evaluation: A Robust LLM-as-a-Judge Framework Beyond Symbolic Rigidity
topic Artificial Intelligence
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.22597