Image de couverture de livre

A pragmatic approach to regulating AI agents

Fuente: arXiv

Enregistré dans:

Détails bibliographiques
Auteurs principaux:	Hacker, Philipp, Holweg, Matthias
Format:	Preprint
Publié:	2026
Sujets:	Computers and Society
Accès en ligne:	Acceder al recurso
Tags:	Ajouter un tag Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!

Documents similaires

Sustainable AI Regulation
par: Hacker, Philipp
Publié: (2023)

Generative Discrimination: What Happens When Generative AI Exhibits Bias, and What Can Be Done About It
par: Hacker, Philipp
Publié: (2024)

AI, Digital Platforms, and the New Systemic Risk
par: Hacker, Philipp, et autres
Publié: (2025)

AI, Climate, and Transparency: Operationalizing and Improving the AI Act
par: Alder, Nicolas, et autres
Publié: (2024)

AI, Climate, and Regulation: From Data Centers to the AI Act
par: Ebert, Kai, et autres
Publié: (2024)

The Global Landscape of Environmental AI Regulation: From the Cost of Reasoning to a Right to Green AI
par: Ebert, Kai, et autres
Publié: (2026)

A pragmatic classification framework for AI incident monitoring
par: Mengesha, Isaak, et autres
Publié: (2026)

A Robust Governance for the AI Act: AI Office, AI Board, Scientific Panel, and National Authorities
par: Novelli, Claudio, et autres
Publié: (2024)

Generative AI in EU Law: Liability, Privacy, Intellectual Property, and Cybersecurity
par: Novelli, Claudio, et autres
Publié: (2024)

Non-discrimination law in Europe: a primer for non-lawyers
par: Borgesius, Frederik Zuiderveen, et autres
Publié: (2024)

Profiling learners' affective engagement: Emotion AI, intercultural pragmatics, and language learning
par: Godwin-Jones, Robert
Publié: (2026)

Defining the scope of AI regulations
par: Schuett, Jonas
Publié: (2019)

Generative AI regulation can learn from social media regulation
par: Appel, Ruth Elisabeth
Publié: (2024)

Does GPT-4 surpass human performance in linguistic pragmatics?
par: Bojic, Ljubisa, et autres
Publié: (2023)

Understanding support for AI regulation: A Bayesian network perspective
par: Cremaschi, Andrea, et autres
Publié: (2025)

The unsuitability of existing regulations to reach sustainable AI
par: Goff, Thomas Le
Publié: (2026)

Do LLMs trust AI regulation? Emerging behaviour of game-theoretic LLM agents
par: Buscemi, Alessio, et autres
Publié: (2025)

The Goldilocks zone of governing technology: Leveraging uncertainty for responsible quantum practices
par: Meckel, Miriam, et autres
Publié: (2025)

Can AI automatically analyze public opinion? A LLM agents-based agentic pipeline for timely public opinion analysis
par: Liu, Jing, et autres
Publié: (2025)

Using algorithms to improve knowledge work
par: Javier Amaya, et autres
Publié: (2024)

Mapping acceptance: micro scenarios as a dual-perspective approach for assessing public opinion and individual differences in technology perception
par: Brauner, Philipp
Publié: (2024)

A testable framework for AI alignment: Simulation Theology as an engineered worldview for silicon-based agents
par: Habdank, Josef A.
Publié: (2026)

Addressing the sustainable AI trilemma: a case study on LLM agents and RAG
par: Wu, Hui, et autres
Publié: (2025)

Domestic frontier AI regulation, an IAEA for AI, an NPT for AI, and a US-led Allied Public-Private Partnership for AI: Four institutions for governing and developing frontier AI
par: Belfield, Haydn
Publié: (2025)

A cross-regional review of AI safety regulations in the commercial aviation
par: Barr, Penny A., et autres
Publié: (2025)

Are AI Machines Making Humans Obsolete?
par: Scheutz, Matthias
Publié: (2025)

AI Meets the Classroom: When Do Large Language Models Harm Learning?
par: Lehmann, Matthias, et autres
Publié: (2024)

Beyond Incompatibility: Trade-offs between Mutually Exclusive Fairness Criteria in Machine Learning and Law
par: Zehlike, Meike, et autres
Publié: (2022)

Fairness and Bias in Algorithmic Hiring: a Multidisciplinary Survey
par: Fabris, Alessandro, et autres
Publié: (2023)

Declare and Justify: Explicit assumptions in AI evaluations are necessary for effective regulation
par: Barnett, Peter, et autres
Publié: (2024)

The Philosophic Turn for AI Agents: Replacing centralized digital rhetoric with decentralized truth-seeking
par: Koralus, Philipp
Publié: (2025)

Episodic memory in AI agents poses risks that should be studied and mitigated
par: DeChant, Chad
Publié: (2025)

A five-layer framework for AI governance: integrating regulation, standards, and certification
par: Agarwal, Avinash, et autres
Publié: (2025)

An ontological approach to foster the convergence, interoperability and operationalization of frameworks for Trustworthy AI
par: Pileggi, Salvatore Flavio
Publié: (2026)

Fair by design: A sociotechnical approach to justifying the fairness of AI-enabled systems across the lifecycle
par: Kaas, Marten H. L., et autres
Publié: (2024)

AI, Metacognition, and the Verification Bottleneck: A Three-Wave Longitudinal Study of Human Problem-Solving
par: Huemmer, Matthias, et autres
Publié: (2026)

AI Systems in Text-Based Online Counselling: Ethical Considerations Across Three Implementation Approaches
par: Steigerwald, Philipp, et autres
Publié: (2026)

A Multi-agent Simulation for the Mass School Shootings
par: Dai, Wei, et autres
Publié: (2024)

Increasing intelligence in AI agents can worsen collective outcomes
par: Johnson, Neil F.
Publié: (2026)

A risk-based approach to assessing liability risk for AI-driven harms considering EU liability directive
par: Narayanan, Sundaraparipurnan, et autres
Publié: (2023)