:: Library Catalog

Cover Image

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Amore, Teal, Berman, Nathan, Jiang, Siyuan
Format:	Preprint
Published:	2026
Subjects:	Software Engineering
Online Access:	https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.23048
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Similar Items

On the Footprints of Reviewer Bots Feedback on Agentic Pull Requests in OSS GitHub Repositories
by: Fatima, Syeda Kaneez, et al.
Published: (2026)

A Longitudinal Analysis of Good First Issue Practices and Newcomer Pull Requests in Popular OSS Projects
by: Hoshikawa, Hirotatsu, et al.
Published: (2026)

GitHub Actions: The Impact on the Pull Request Process
by: Wessel, Mairieli, et al.
Published: (2022)

Let's Make Every Pull Request Meaningful: An Empirical Analysis of Developer and Agentic Pull Requests
by: Yoshioka, Haruhiko, et al.
Published: (2026)

The Value of Effective Pull Request Description
by: Pirouzkhah, Shirin, et al.
Published: (2026)

Generative AI for Pull Request Descriptions: Adoption, Impact, and Developer Interventions
by: Xiao, Tao, et al.
Published: (2024)

Evaluating the Impact of Data Cleaning on the Quality of Generated Pull Request Descriptions
by: Tire, Kutay, et al.
Published: (2025)

Change And Cover: Last-Mile, Pull Request-Based Regression Test Augmentation
by: Zhou, Zitong, et al.
Published: (2026)

Do Autonomous Agents Contribute Test Code? A Study of Tests in Agentic Pull Requests
by: Haque, Sabrina, et al.
Published: (2026)

Human-Agent versus Human Pull Requests: A Testing-Focused Characterization and Comparison
by: Milanese, Roberto, et al.
Published: (2026)

Insights into Security-Related AI-Generated Pull Requests
by: Rabbi, Md Fazle, et al.
Published: (2026)

Empirical Analysis of Pull Requests for Google Summer of Code
by: Popoola, Saheed
Published: (2024)

Why Are Agentic Pull Requests Merged or Rejected? An Empirical Study
by: Peralta, Sien Reeve O., et al.
Published: (2026)

The Quiet Contributions: Insights into AI-Generated Silent Pull Requests
by: Hasan, S M Mahedy, et al.
Published: (2026)

A Study of Library Usage in Agent-Authored Pull Requests
by: Twist, Lukas, et al.
Published: (2025)

On the Use of Agentic Coding: An Empirical Study of Pull Requests on GitHub
by: Watanabe, Miku, et al.
Published: (2025)

How Do Developers Use Code Suggestions in Pull Request Reviews?
by: Bouraffa, Abir, et al.
Published: (2025)

Improving Merge Pipeline Throughput in Continuous Integration via Pull Request Prioritization
by: Jungwirth, Maximilian, et al.
Published: (2025)

Sphinx: Benchmarking and Modeling for LLM-Driven Pull Request Review
by: Zhang, Daoan, et al.
Published: (2026)

MELT: Mining Effective Lightweight Transformations from Pull Requests
by: Ramos, Daniel, et al.
Published: (2023)

Comparing AI Coding Agents: A Task-Stratified Analysis of Pull Request Acceptance
by: Pinna, Giovanni, et al.
Published: (2026)

Humans Integrate, Agents Fix: How Agent-Authored Pull Requests Are Referenced in Practice
by: Khemissi, Islem, et al.
Published: (2026)

What Developers Ask to ChatGPT in GitHub Pull Requests? an Exploratory Study
by: Silva, Julyanara R., et al.
Published: (2025)

Quality Gatekeepers: Investigating the Effects ofCode Review Bots on Pull Request Activities
by: Wessel, Mairieli, et al.
Published: (2021)

Investigating the Impact of Interpersonal Challenges on Feeling Welcome in OSS
by: Trinkenreich, Bianca, et al.
Published: (2024)

Quality and Security Signals in AI-Generated Python Refactoring Pull Requests
by: Almukhtar, Mohamed, et al.
Published: (2026)

These Aren't the Reviews You're Looking For How Humans Review AI-Generated Pull Requests
by: Duma, Kacper, et al.
Published: (2026)

From Industry Claims to Empirical Reality: An Empirical Study of Code Review Agents in Pull Requests
by: Chowdhury, Kowshik, et al.
Published: (2026)

Collaborator or Assistant? How AI Coding Agents Partition Work Across Pull Request Lifecycles
by: Jo, Young, et al.
Published: (2026)

Who Said CVE? How Vulnerability Identifiers Are Mentioned by Humans, Bots, and Agents in Pull Requests
by: Rooijendijk, Pien, et al.
Published: (2026)

An Empirical Study on Developers Shared Conversations with ChatGPT in GitHub Pull Requests and Issues
by: Hao, Huizi, et al.
Published: (2024)

OSS Myths and Facts
by: Iimura, Yukako, et al.
Published: (2024)

The Death Spiral of Open Source Projects: A Post-Mortem Analysis of Pull Request Workflow Dynamics
by: Kaushik, Mohit, et al.
Published: (2026)

Code Change Characteristics and Description Alignment: A Comparative Study of Agentic versus Human Pull Requests
by: Pham, Dung, et al.
Published: (2026)

Analyzing Message-Code Inconsistency in AI Coding Agent-Authored Pull Requests
by: Gong, Jingzhi, et al.
Published: (2026)

Learning to Commit: Generating Organic Pull Requests via Online Repository Memory
by: Li, Mo, et al.
Published: (2026)

Towards Bridging Language Gaps in OSS with LLM-Driven Documentation Translation
by: Adejumo, Elijah Kayode, et al.
Published: (2025)

Early-Stage Prediction of Review Effort in AI-Generated Pull Requests
by: Minh, Dao Sy Duy, et al.
Published: (2026)

On Wasted Contributions: Understanding the Dynamics of Contributor-Abandoned Pull Requests
by: Khatoonabadi, SayedHassan, et al.
Published: (2021)

Predicting the First Response Latency of Maintainers and Contributors in Pull Requests
by: Khatoonabadi, SayedHassan, et al.
Published: (2023)