Copertina

The Impact of Documentation on Test Engagement in Pull Requests in OSS

Fuente: arXiv

Salvato in:

Dettagli Bibliografici
Autori principali:	Amore, Teal, Berman, Nathan, Jiang, Siyuan
Natura:	Preprint
Pubblicazione:	2026
Soggetti:	Software Engineering
Accesso online:	Acceder al recurso
Tags:	Aggiungi Tag Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!

Documenti analoghi

On the Footprints of Reviewer Bots Feedback on Agentic Pull Requests in OSS GitHub Repositories
di: Fatima, Syeda Kaneez, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

A Longitudinal Analysis of Good First Issue Practices and Newcomer Pull Requests in Popular OSS Projects
di: Hoshikawa, Hirotatsu, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

GitHub Actions: The Impact on the Pull Request Process
di: Wessel, Mairieli, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2022)

Let's Make Every Pull Request Meaningful: An Empirical Analysis of Developer and Agentic Pull Requests
di: Yoshioka, Haruhiko, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

The Value of Effective Pull Request Description
di: Pirouzkhah, Shirin, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

Generative AI for Pull Request Descriptions: Adoption, Impact, and Developer Interventions
di: Xiao, Tao, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

Evaluating the Impact of Data Cleaning on the Quality of Generated Pull Request Descriptions
di: Tire, Kutay, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Change And Cover: Last-Mile, Pull Request-Based Regression Test Augmentation
di: Zhou, Zitong, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

Do Autonomous Agents Contribute Test Code? A Study of Tests in Agentic Pull Requests
di: Haque, Sabrina, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

Human-Agent versus Human Pull Requests: A Testing-Focused Characterization and Comparison
di: Milanese, Roberto, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

Insights into Security-Related AI-Generated Pull Requests
di: Rabbi, Md Fazle, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

Empirical Analysis of Pull Requests for Google Summer of Code
di: Popoola, Saheed
Pubblicazione: (2024)

Why Are Agentic Pull Requests Merged or Rejected? An Empirical Study
di: Peralta, Sien Reeve O., et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

The Quiet Contributions: Insights into AI-Generated Silent Pull Requests
di: Hasan, S M Mahedy, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

A Study of Library Usage in Agent-Authored Pull Requests
di: Twist, Lukas, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

On the Use of Agentic Coding: An Empirical Study of Pull Requests on GitHub
di: Watanabe, Miku, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

How Do Developers Use Code Suggestions in Pull Request Reviews?
di: Bouraffa, Abir, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Improving Merge Pipeline Throughput in Continuous Integration via Pull Request Prioritization
di: Jungwirth, Maximilian, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Comparing AI Coding Agents: A Task-Stratified Analysis of Pull Request Acceptance
di: Pinna, Giovanni, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

Humans Integrate, Agents Fix: How Agent-Authored Pull Requests Are Referenced in Practice
di: Khemissi, Islem, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

What Developers Ask to ChatGPT in GitHub Pull Requests? an Exploratory Study
di: Silva, Julyanara R., et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Quality Gatekeepers: Investigating the Effects ofCode Review Bots on Pull Request Activities
di: Wessel, Mairieli, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2021)

Investigating the Impact of Interpersonal Challenges on Feeling Welcome in OSS
di: Trinkenreich, Bianca, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

Sphinx: Benchmarking and Modeling for LLM-Driven Pull Request Review
di: Zhang, Daoan, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

MELT: Mining Effective Lightweight Transformations from Pull Requests
di: Ramos, Daniel, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2023)

These Aren't the Reviews You're Looking For How Humans Review AI-Generated Pull Requests
di: Duma, Kacper, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

From Industry Claims to Empirical Reality: An Empirical Study of Code Review Agents in Pull Requests
di: Chowdhury, Kowshik, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

Collaborator or Assistant? How AI Coding Agents Partition Work Across Pull Request Lifecycles
di: Jo, Young, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

Who Said CVE? How Vulnerability Identifiers Are Mentioned by Humans, Bots, and Agents in Pull Requests
di: Rooijendijk, Pien, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

An Empirical Study on Developers Shared Conversations with ChatGPT in GitHub Pull Requests and Issues
di: Hao, Huizi, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

Quality and Security Signals in AI-Generated Python Refactoring Pull Requests
di: Almukhtar, Mohamed, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

OSS Myths and Facts
di: Iimura, Yukako, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

Towards Bridging Language Gaps in OSS with LLM-Driven Documentation Translation
di: Adejumo, Elijah Kayode, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

The Death Spiral of Open Source Projects: A Post-Mortem Analysis of Pull Request Workflow Dynamics
di: Kaushik, Mohit, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

Code Change Characteristics and Description Alignment: A Comparative Study of Agentic versus Human Pull Requests
di: Pham, Dung, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

Beyond Bug Fixes: An Empirical Investigation of Post-Merge Code Quality Issues in Agent-Generated Pull Requests
di: Cynthia, Shamse Tasnim, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

Analyzing GitHub Issues and Pull Requests in nf-core Pipelines: Insights into nf-core Pipeline Repositories
di: Alam, Khairul, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

How Do Agentic AI Systems Deal With Software Energy Concerns? A Pull Request-Based Study
di: Mitul, Tanjum Motin, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

How Do Agentic AI Systems Address Performance Optimizations? A BERTopic-Based Analysis of Pull Requests
di: Opu, Md Nahidul Islam, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Analyzing Message-Code Inconsistency in AI Coding Agent-Authored Pull Requests
di: Gong, Jingzhi, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)