Fine-tuning vs. In-context Learning in Large Language Models: A Formal Language Learning Perspective
Fuente:
arXiv
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2026
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866916022241460224 |
|---|---|
| author | Ghosh, Bishwamittra Das, Soumi Speicher, Till Wu, Qinyuan Khan, Mohammad Aflah Garg, Deepak Gummadi, Krishna P. Terzi, Evimaria |
| author_facet | Ghosh, Bishwamittra Das, Soumi Speicher, Till Wu, Qinyuan Khan, Mohammad Aflah Garg, Deepak Gummadi, Krishna P. Terzi, Evimaria |
| contents | Large language models (LLMs) operate in two fundamental learning modes - fine-tuning (FT) and in-context learning (ICL) - raising key questions about which mode yields greater language proficiency and whether they differ in their inductive biases. Prior studies comparing FT and ICL have yielded mixed and inconclusive results due to inconsistent experimental setups. To enable a rigorous comparison, we propose a formal language learning task - offering precise language boundaries, controlled string sampling, and no data contamination - and introduce a discriminative test for language proficiency, where an LLM succeeds if it assigns higher generation probability to in-language strings than to out-of-language strings.
Empirically, we find that: (a) FT has greater language proficiency than ICL on in-distribution generalization, but both perform equally well on out-of-distribution generalization. (b) Their inductive biases, measured by the correlation in string generation probabilities, are similar when both modes partially learn the language but diverge at higher proficiency levels. (c) Unlike FT, ICL performance differs substantially across models of varying sizes and families and is sensitive to the token vocabulary of the language. Thus, our work demonstrates the promise of formal languages as a controlled testbed for evaluating LLMs, behaviors that are difficult to isolate in natural language datasets. Our source code is available at https://github.com/bishwamittra/formallm. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2604_23267 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Fine-tuning vs. In-context Learning in Large Language Models: A Formal Language Learning Perspective Ghosh, Bishwamittra Das, Soumi Speicher, Till Wu, Qinyuan Khan, Mohammad Aflah Garg, Deepak Gummadi, Krishna P. Terzi, Evimaria Computation and Language Machine Learning Large language models (LLMs) operate in two fundamental learning modes - fine-tuning (FT) and in-context learning (ICL) - raising key questions about which mode yields greater language proficiency and whether they differ in their inductive biases. Prior studies comparing FT and ICL have yielded mixed and inconclusive results due to inconsistent experimental setups. To enable a rigorous comparison, we propose a formal language learning task - offering precise language boundaries, controlled string sampling, and no data contamination - and introduce a discriminative test for language proficiency, where an LLM succeeds if it assigns higher generation probability to in-language strings than to out-of-language strings. Empirically, we find that: (a) FT has greater language proficiency than ICL on in-distribution generalization, but both perform equally well on out-of-distribution generalization. (b) Their inductive biases, measured by the correlation in string generation probabilities, are similar when both modes partially learn the language but diverge at higher proficiency levels. (c) Unlike FT, ICL performance differs substantially across models of varying sizes and families and is sensitive to the token vocabulary of the language. Thus, our work demonstrates the promise of formal languages as a controlled testbed for evaluating LLMs, behaviors that are difficult to isolate in natural language datasets. Our source code is available at https://github.com/bishwamittra/formallm. |
| title | Fine-tuning vs. In-context Learning in Large Language Models: A Formal Language Learning Perspective |
| topic | Computation and Language Machine Learning |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.23267 |