Cover Image

Are Digital Humanities really committed to open? An exploratory study on the availability of methodological workflows and open peer review practices

Fuente: arXiv

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Peroni, Silvio
Format:	Preprint
Published:	2026
Subjects:	Digital Libraries
Online Access:	Acceder al recurso
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Similar Items

Thinking Outside the Black Box: Insights from a Digital Exhibition in the Humanities
by: Barzaghi, Sebastian, et al.
Published: (2024)

HERITRACE: a domain-agnostic framework for SHACL-driven RDF curation with provenance and change tracking
by: Massari, Arcangelo, et al.
Published: (2026)

Mapping bibliographic metadata collections: the case of OpenCitations Meta and OpenAlex
by: Rizzetto, Elia, et al.
Published: (2023)

HERITRACE: A User-Friendly Semantic Data Editor with Change Tracking and Provenance Management for Cultural Heritage Institutions
by: Massari, Arcangelo, et al.
Published: (2025)

HERITRACE: Tracing Evolution and Bridging Data for Streamlined Curatorial Work in the GLAM Domain
by: Massari, Arcangelo, et al.
Published: (2024)

HERITRACE in action: the ParaText project as a case study for semantic data management in Classical Philology
by: Filograsso, Francesca, et al.
Published: (2025)

A Workflow for GLAM Metadata Crosswalk
by: Moretti, Arianna, et al.
Published: (2024)

Assessing and Comparing the Coverage of Italian Publications in OpenCitations: a Study within Six Italian Universities
by: Andreose, Erica, et al.
Published: (2026)

Developing Application Profiles for Enhancing Data and Workflows in Cultural Heritage Digitisation Processes
by: Barzaghi, Sebastian, et al.
Published: (2024)

CHAD-KG: A Knowledge Graph for Representing Cultural Heritage Objects and Digitisation Paradata
by: Barzaghi, Sebastian, et al.
Published: (2025)

Representing provenance and track changes of cultural heritage metadata in RDF: a survey of existing approaches
by: Massari, Arcangelo, et al.
Published: (2023)

The OpenCitations Index
by: Heibi, Ivan, et al.
Published: (2024)

Recent Developments in Deep Learning-based Author Name Disambiguation
by: Cappelli, Francesca, et al.
Published: (2024)

FMMD: A multimodal open peer review dataset based on F1000Research
by: Zhuang, Zhenzhen, et al.
Published: (2026)

Leveraging virtual technologies to enhance museums and art collections: insights from project CHANGES
by: Genovese, Gianluca, et al.
Published: (2024)

A pipeline for matching bibliographic references with incomplete metadata: experiments with Crossref and OpenCitations
by: Guenci, Matteo, et al.
Published: (2025)

OpenCitations Meta
by: Massari, Arcangelo, et al.
Published: (2023)

Validating and monitoring bibliographic and citation data in OpenCitations collections
by: Heibi, Ivan, et al.
Published: (2025)

Estimating transformative agreement impact on hybrid open access: A comparative large-scale study using Scopus, Web of Science and open metadata
by: Jahn, Najko
Published: (2025)

The current state of open access
by: Sugita, Shigeki
Published: (2025)

Analysing the coverage of the University of Bologna's bibliographic and citation metadata in OpenCitations collections
by: Andreose, Erica, et al.
Published: (2025)

Diamond open access and open infrastructures have shaped the Canadian scholarly journal landscape since the start of the digital era
by: van Bellen, Simon, et al.
Published: (2024)

An open framework for archival, reproducible, and transparent science
by: Dasgupta, Sabar, et al.
Published: (2025)

Reforming research funding: Combining editorial preregistration with grant peer review
by: Bornmann, Lutz, et al.
Published: (2025)

Transparency to hybrid open access through publisher-provided metadata: An article-level study of Elsevier
by: Jahn, Najko, et al.
Published: (2021)

Biases in gendered citation practices: an exploratory study and some reflections on the Matthew and Matilda effects
by: Tchilinguirova, Karolina, et al.
Published: (2024)

How open are hybrid journals included in transformative agreements?
by: Jahn, Najko
Published: (2024)

Funders open access mandates: uneven uptake and challenging models
by: Céspedes, Lucía, et al.
Published: (2026)

A maturity model for catalogues of semantic artefacts
by: Corcho, Oscar, et al.
Published: (2023)

The open access coverage of OpenAlex, Scopus and Web of Science
by: Simard, Marc-Andre, et al.
Published: (2024)

How do referees integrate evaluation criteria into their overall judgment? Evidence from grant peer review
by: Hug, Sven E.
Published: (2023)

A Proposal for a FAIR Management of 3D Data in Cultural Heritage: The Aldrovandi Digital Twin Case
by: Barzaghi, Sebastian, et al.
Published: (2024)

The hunt for research data: Development of an open-source workflow for tracking institutionally-affiliated research data publications
by: Gee, Bryan M.
Published: (2025)

Thinking like a business: Reconfiguring relationships to sustain open data infrastructures
by: Gregory, Kathleen, et al.
Published: (2026)

An analysis of the effects of open science indicators on citations in the French Open Science Monitor
by: Colavizza, Giovanni, et al.
Published: (2025)

On the modification and revocation of open source licences
by: Gagnon, Paul, et al.
Published: (2024)

Demanding peer review is associated with higher impact in published science
by: Jiang, Huihuang, et al.
Published: (2026)

OpenAlex: Features, advantages and limitations of an open database for retrieving and analysing scholarly outputs
by: Borrego, Ángel, et al.
Published: (2025)

Cultural gems linked open data: Mapping culture and intangible heritage in European cities
by: Consoli, Sergio, et al.
Published: (2024)

Recording provenance of workflow runs with RO-Crate
by: Leo, Simone, et al.
Published: (2023)