Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2026
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.23854 |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| _version_ | 1866918468515790848 |
|---|---|
| author | Falcao, Andreza M. C. Cordeiro, Filipe R. |
| author_facet | Falcao, Andreza M. C. Cordeiro, Filipe R. |
| contents | The application of Deep Learning in medical diagnosis must balance patient safety with compliance with data protection regulations. Machine Unlearning enables the selective removal of training data from deployed models. However, most methods are validated primarily through efficiency and privacy-oriented metrics, with limited attention to clinically asymmetric error costs. In this work, we investigate how unlearning affects clinical risk in binary medical image classification. We show that standard unlearning strategies (Fine-Tuning, Random Labeling, and SalUn) may reduce test utility while increasing false-negative rates, thereby amplifying clinical risk. To mitigate this, we propose SalUn-CRA (Clinical Risk-Aware), a variant of SalUn that replaces random relabeling with entropy-based forgetting for malignant samples in the forget set, preventing the model from learning harmful benign associations. We evaluate on DermaMNIST and PathMNIST medical image datasets under 20% and 50% data removal. Using Global Risk metrics with asymmetric costs, SalUn-CRA achieves lower or comparable clinical risk to full retraining while preserving unlearning effectiveness. These results suggest that clinical risk should be an integral component of unlearning validation in medical systems. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2604_23854 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Does Machine Unlearning Preserve Clinical Safety? A Risk Analysis for Medical Image Classification Falcao, Andreza M. C. Cordeiro, Filipe R. Artificial Intelligence The application of Deep Learning in medical diagnosis must balance patient safety with compliance with data protection regulations. Machine Unlearning enables the selective removal of training data from deployed models. However, most methods are validated primarily through efficiency and privacy-oriented metrics, with limited attention to clinically asymmetric error costs. In this work, we investigate how unlearning affects clinical risk in binary medical image classification. We show that standard unlearning strategies (Fine-Tuning, Random Labeling, and SalUn) may reduce test utility while increasing false-negative rates, thereby amplifying clinical risk. To mitigate this, we propose SalUn-CRA (Clinical Risk-Aware), a variant of SalUn that replaces random relabeling with entropy-based forgetting for malignant samples in the forget set, preventing the model from learning harmful benign associations. We evaluate on DermaMNIST and PathMNIST medical image datasets under 20% and 50% data removal. Using Global Risk metrics with asymmetric costs, SalUn-CRA achieves lower or comparable clinical risk to full retraining while preserving unlearning effectiveness. These results suggest that clinical risk should be an integral component of unlearning validation in medical systems. |
| title | Does Machine Unlearning Preserve Clinical Safety? A Risk Analysis for Medical Image Classification |
| topic | Artificial Intelligence |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.23854 |