Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. Verfasser: Bae, Changdeuck
Format: Preprint
Veröffentlicht: 2026
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.24075
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1866914509792215040
author Bae, Changdeuck
author_facet Bae, Changdeuck
contents All-solid-state batteries fail not only by bulk transport limits, but by a reactive interface that evolves during cycling. We show that degradation is governed by two coupled processes: interfacial breathing, the cycle-scale oscillation of lithium contact, and reactive memory, the slow accumulation of electrolyte decomposition. Four descriptors capture breathing, together with a memory metric based on decomposed interphase thickness. A reduced electrochemical benchmark shows that ionic conductivity has little effect on mean discharge voltage, whereas cathode electrolyte interphase resistance causes major voltage and energy losses. A phase-field model of a sulfide-based cell shows that higher stack pressure strongly suppresses breathing-related fluctuations, but leaves reactive memory nearly unchanged. Thus, pressure controls breathing, not memory. The resulting regime map identifies void-growth-dominant, healing-dominant, and interphase-memory-dominant regions. The theory also predicts energy-density rank inversion with C rate, where an initially superior architecture loses advantage at higher rate as breathing intensifies and interphase memory locks in. The design target is therefore not merely higher conductivity or lower resistance, but simultaneous suppression of breathing and independent control of reactive memory through interphase chemistry.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2604_24075
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Interfacial breathing as a dynamic failure law in all-solid-state batteries: amplitude, phase lag and dual-timescale memory as design principles
Bae, Changdeuck
Materials Science
All-solid-state batteries fail not only by bulk transport limits, but by a reactive interface that evolves during cycling. We show that degradation is governed by two coupled processes: interfacial breathing, the cycle-scale oscillation of lithium contact, and reactive memory, the slow accumulation of electrolyte decomposition. Four descriptors capture breathing, together with a memory metric based on decomposed interphase thickness. A reduced electrochemical benchmark shows that ionic conductivity has little effect on mean discharge voltage, whereas cathode electrolyte interphase resistance causes major voltage and energy losses. A phase-field model of a sulfide-based cell shows that higher stack pressure strongly suppresses breathing-related fluctuations, but leaves reactive memory nearly unchanged. Thus, pressure controls breathing, not memory. The resulting regime map identifies void-growth-dominant, healing-dominant, and interphase-memory-dominant regions. The theory also predicts energy-density rank inversion with C rate, where an initially superior architecture loses advantage at higher rate as breathing intensifies and interphase memory locks in. The design target is therefore not merely higher conductivity or lower resistance, but simultaneous suppression of breathing and independent control of reactive memory through interphase chemistry.
title Interfacial breathing as a dynamic failure law in all-solid-state batteries: amplitude, phase lag and dual-timescale memory as design principles
topic Materials Science
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.24075