Quantitative Pulse Shape-Instability Analysis Using 2D-Runs FROG
Fuente:
arXiv
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2026
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866914608280764416 |
|---|---|
| author | Abdolghader, Pedram Jafari, Rana Das, Abinash Banerjee, Bilol Crews, E. P. Duchrist Trebino, Rick |
| author_facet | Abdolghader, Pedram Jafari, Rana Das, Abinash Banerjee, Bilol Crews, E. P. Duchrist Trebino, Rick |
| contents | We present a method for quantifying pulse-shape instability in a train of pulses using multi-shot Second-Harmonic-Generation Frequency-Resolved Optical Gating (SHG FROG). All versions of multi-shot FROG have previously shown the ability to distinguish stable from unstable pulse trains, as systematic differences appear between measured and retrieved traces when instability is present. This has proved possible because the recently introduced Retrieved-Amplitude N-grid Algorithmic (RANA) approach provides highly reliable pulse retrieval, even for unstable pulse trains and in the presence of noise, thus eliminating the possibility that algorithm stagnation, which mimics the effects of pulse-shape instability, could be confused for it. In other words, RANAs excellent performance ensures that any non-random discrepancies between measured and retrieved FROG traces reflect physical pulse-shape instability, rather than algorithmic stagnation. To begin to quantify such instability, we now introduce an instability parameter, R. It involves the use of the well-known statistical Runs test, which tests for systematic error in fits to one-dimensional (1D) data. A runs test counts the runs consecutive points in the plot of the difference between the data and fit with the same sign evaluating the goodness of the fit while minimizing the effects of random error. However, because FROG traces are functions of two variables, we must extend the usual 1D runs test to two dimensions, that is, to enumerate 2D runs hills and valleys in the difference between measured and retrieved 2D FROG traces. Many small 2D runs indicate only random noise-like differences and hence a stable pulse train, whereas few large runs reflect additional systematic error and hence pulse-shape instability. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2604_24359 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Quantitative Pulse Shape-Instability Analysis Using 2D-Runs FROG Abdolghader, Pedram Jafari, Rana Das, Abinash Banerjee, Bilol Crews, E. P. Duchrist Trebino, Rick Optics Atomic Physics We present a method for quantifying pulse-shape instability in a train of pulses using multi-shot Second-Harmonic-Generation Frequency-Resolved Optical Gating (SHG FROG). All versions of multi-shot FROG have previously shown the ability to distinguish stable from unstable pulse trains, as systematic differences appear between measured and retrieved traces when instability is present. This has proved possible because the recently introduced Retrieved-Amplitude N-grid Algorithmic (RANA) approach provides highly reliable pulse retrieval, even for unstable pulse trains and in the presence of noise, thus eliminating the possibility that algorithm stagnation, which mimics the effects of pulse-shape instability, could be confused for it. In other words, RANAs excellent performance ensures that any non-random discrepancies between measured and retrieved FROG traces reflect physical pulse-shape instability, rather than algorithmic stagnation. To begin to quantify such instability, we now introduce an instability parameter, R. It involves the use of the well-known statistical Runs test, which tests for systematic error in fits to one-dimensional (1D) data. A runs test counts the runs consecutive points in the plot of the difference between the data and fit with the same sign evaluating the goodness of the fit while minimizing the effects of random error. However, because FROG traces are functions of two variables, we must extend the usual 1D runs test to two dimensions, that is, to enumerate 2D runs hills and valleys in the difference between measured and retrieved 2D FROG traces. Many small 2D runs indicate only random noise-like differences and hence a stable pulse train, whereas few large runs reflect additional systematic error and hence pulse-shape instability. |
| title | Quantitative Pulse Shape-Instability Analysis Using 2D-Runs FROG |
| topic | Optics Atomic Physics |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.24359 |