Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2026
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.24697 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866917513699262464 |
|---|---|
| author | Ziheng, Zhou Tang, Huacong Zhang, Jinyuan Lin, Haowei Yang, Bangcheng Long, Qian Sun, Fang Sun, Yizhou Liang, Yitao Wu, Ying Nian Terzopoulos, Demetri Gao, Xiaofeng |
| author_facet | Ziheng, Zhou Tang, Huacong Zhang, Jinyuan Lin, Haowei Yang, Bangcheng Long, Qian Sun, Fang Sun, Yizhou Liang, Yitao Wu, Ying Nian Terzopoulos, Demetri Gao, Xiaofeng |
| contents | Discovering causal regularities and applying them to build functional systems--the discovery-to-application loop--is a hallmark of general intelligence, yet evaluating this capacity has been hindered by the vast complexity gap between scientific discovery and real-world engineering. We introduce SciCrafter, a Minecraft-based benchmark that operationalizes this loop through parameterized redstone circuit tasks. Agents must ignite lamps in specified patterns (e.g., simultaneously or in timed sequences); scaling target parameters substantially increases construction complexity and required knowledge, forcing genuine discovery rather than reliance on memorized solutions. Evaluating frontier models including GPT-5.2, Gemini-3-Pro, and Claude-Opus-4.5 under a general-purpose code agent scaffold, we find that all plateau at approximately 26% success rate. To diagnose these failures, we decompose the loop into four capacities--knowledge gap identification, experimental discovery, knowledge consolidation, and knowledge application--and design targeted interventions whose marginal contributions serve as proxies for corresponding gaps. Our analysis reveals that although the general knowledge application capability still remains as the biggest gap across all models, for frontier models the knowledge gap identification starts to become a major hurdle--indicating the bottleneck is shifting from solving problems right to raising the right problems for current AI. We release SciCrafter as a diagnostic probe for future research on AI systems that navigate the full discovery-to-application loop. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2604_24697 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Can Current Agents Close the Discovery-to-Application Gap? A Case Study in Minecraft Ziheng, Zhou Tang, Huacong Zhang, Jinyuan Lin, Haowei Yang, Bangcheng Long, Qian Sun, Fang Sun, Yizhou Liang, Yitao Wu, Ying Nian Terzopoulos, Demetri Gao, Xiaofeng Artificial Intelligence Discovering causal regularities and applying them to build functional systems--the discovery-to-application loop--is a hallmark of general intelligence, yet evaluating this capacity has been hindered by the vast complexity gap between scientific discovery and real-world engineering. We introduce SciCrafter, a Minecraft-based benchmark that operationalizes this loop through parameterized redstone circuit tasks. Agents must ignite lamps in specified patterns (e.g., simultaneously or in timed sequences); scaling target parameters substantially increases construction complexity and required knowledge, forcing genuine discovery rather than reliance on memorized solutions. Evaluating frontier models including GPT-5.2, Gemini-3-Pro, and Claude-Opus-4.5 under a general-purpose code agent scaffold, we find that all plateau at approximately 26% success rate. To diagnose these failures, we decompose the loop into four capacities--knowledge gap identification, experimental discovery, knowledge consolidation, and knowledge application--and design targeted interventions whose marginal contributions serve as proxies for corresponding gaps. Our analysis reveals that although the general knowledge application capability still remains as the biggest gap across all models, for frontier models the knowledge gap identification starts to become a major hurdle--indicating the bottleneck is shifting from solving problems right to raising the right problems for current AI. We release SciCrafter as a diagnostic probe for future research on AI systems that navigate the full discovery-to-application loop. |
| title | Can Current Agents Close the Discovery-to-Application Gap? A Case Study in Minecraft |
| topic | Artificial Intelligence |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.24697 |