Agentic AI for Remote Sensing: Technical Challenges and Research Directions
Fuente:
arXiv
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2026
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| _version_ | 1866911737889947648 |
|---|---|
| author | Munir, Muhammad Akhtar Sheikh, Muhammad Umer Shabbir, Akashah Khan, Muhammad Haris Khan, Fahad Zhu, Xiao Xiang Demir, Begüm Khan, Salman |
| author_facet | Munir, Muhammad Akhtar Sheikh, Muhammad Umer Shabbir, Akashah Khan, Muhammad Haris Khan, Fahad Zhu, Xiao Xiang Demir, Begüm Khan, Salman |
| contents | Earth Observation (EO) is moving beyond static prediction toward multi-step analytical workflows that require coordinated reasoning over data, tools, and geospatial state. While foundation models and vision-language models have advanced representation learning and language-grounded interaction in remote sensing, and agentic AI has shown strong potential for long-horizon reasoning and tool use, EO is not a straightforward extension of generic agentic AI. EO workflows operate on georeferenced, multi-modal, and temporally structured data, where operations such as reprojection, resampling, compositing, and aggregation transform the underlying state and can constrain later analysis. As a result, errors may propagate silently across steps, and correctness depends not only on internal coherence but also on geospatial consistency, temporally valid comparisons, and physical validity. This position paper argues that these challenges are structural rather than incidental. We examine the assumptions commonly made in generic agentic systems, analyze how they break in geospatial workflows, and characterize failure modes in multi-step EO pipelines. We then outline design principles for EO-native agents centered on structured geospatial state, tool-aware reasoning, verifier-guided execution, and validity-aware learning and evaluation. Building reliable geospatial agents, therefore, requires rethinking agent design around the physical, geospatial, and workflow constraints that govern EO analysis. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2604_24919 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Agentic AI for Remote Sensing: Technical Challenges and Research Directions Munir, Muhammad Akhtar Sheikh, Muhammad Umer Shabbir, Akashah Khan, Muhammad Haris Khan, Fahad Zhu, Xiao Xiang Demir, Begüm Khan, Salman Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Earth Observation (EO) is moving beyond static prediction toward multi-step analytical workflows that require coordinated reasoning over data, tools, and geospatial state. While foundation models and vision-language models have advanced representation learning and language-grounded interaction in remote sensing, and agentic AI has shown strong potential for long-horizon reasoning and tool use, EO is not a straightforward extension of generic agentic AI. EO workflows operate on georeferenced, multi-modal, and temporally structured data, where operations such as reprojection, resampling, compositing, and aggregation transform the underlying state and can constrain later analysis. As a result, errors may propagate silently across steps, and correctness depends not only on internal coherence but also on geospatial consistency, temporally valid comparisons, and physical validity. This position paper argues that these challenges are structural rather than incidental. We examine the assumptions commonly made in generic agentic systems, analyze how they break in geospatial workflows, and characterize failure modes in multi-step EO pipelines. We then outline design principles for EO-native agents centered on structured geospatial state, tool-aware reasoning, verifier-guided execution, and validity-aware learning and evaluation. Building reliable geospatial agents, therefore, requires rethinking agent design around the physical, geospatial, and workflow constraints that govern EO analysis. |
| title | Agentic AI for Remote Sensing: Technical Challenges and Research Directions |
| topic | Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.24919 |