Salvato in:
| Autori principali: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Natura: | Preprint |
| Pubblicazione: |
2026
|
| Soggetti: | |
| Accesso online: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.25774 |
| Tags: |
Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
|
| _version_ | 1866910215269515264 |
|---|---|
| author | Chen, Wei-Chun Chen, Yu-Xuan Chung, I-Fang Lin, Ying-Jia |
| author_facet | Chen, Wei-Chun Chen, Yu-Xuan Chung, I-Fang Lin, Ying-Jia |
| contents | Accurate nutrient estimation from unstructured recipe text is an important yet challenging problem in dietary monitoring, due to ambiguous ingredient terminology and highly variable quantity expressions. We systematically evaluate models spanning a wide range of representational capacity, from lexical matching methods (TF-IDF with Ridge Regression), to deep semantic encoders (DeBERTa-v3), to generative reasoning with large language models (LLMs). Under the strict tolerance criteria defined by EU Regulation 1169/2011, our empirical results reveal a clear trade-off between predictive accuracy and computational efficiency. The TF-IDF baseline achieves moderate nutrient estimation performance with near-instantaneous inference, whereas the DeBERTa-v3 encoder performs poorly under task-specific data scarcity. In contrast, few-shot LLM inference (e.g., Gemini 2.5 Flash) and a hybrid LLM refinement pipeline (TF-IDF combined with Gemini 2.5 Flash) deliver the highest validation accuracy across all nutrient categories. These improvements likely arise from the ability of LLMs to leverage pre-trained world knowledge to resolve ambiguous terminology and normalize non-standard units, which remain difficult for purely lexical approaches. However, these gains come at the cost of substantially higher inference latency, highlighting a practical deployment trade-off between real-time efficiency and nutritional precision in dietary monitoring systems. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2604_25774 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | CGU-ILALab at FoodBench-QA 2026: Comparing Traditional and LLM-based Approaches for Recipe Nutrient Estimation Chen, Wei-Chun Chen, Yu-Xuan Chung, I-Fang Lin, Ying-Jia Computation and Language Artificial Intelligence Accurate nutrient estimation from unstructured recipe text is an important yet challenging problem in dietary monitoring, due to ambiguous ingredient terminology and highly variable quantity expressions. We systematically evaluate models spanning a wide range of representational capacity, from lexical matching methods (TF-IDF with Ridge Regression), to deep semantic encoders (DeBERTa-v3), to generative reasoning with large language models (LLMs). Under the strict tolerance criteria defined by EU Regulation 1169/2011, our empirical results reveal a clear trade-off between predictive accuracy and computational efficiency. The TF-IDF baseline achieves moderate nutrient estimation performance with near-instantaneous inference, whereas the DeBERTa-v3 encoder performs poorly under task-specific data scarcity. In contrast, few-shot LLM inference (e.g., Gemini 2.5 Flash) and a hybrid LLM refinement pipeline (TF-IDF combined with Gemini 2.5 Flash) deliver the highest validation accuracy across all nutrient categories. These improvements likely arise from the ability of LLMs to leverage pre-trained world knowledge to resolve ambiguous terminology and normalize non-standard units, which remain difficult for purely lexical approaches. However, these gains come at the cost of substantially higher inference latency, highlighting a practical deployment trade-off between real-time efficiency and nutritional precision in dietary monitoring systems. |
| title | CGU-ILALab at FoodBench-QA 2026: Comparing Traditional and LLM-based Approaches for Recipe Nutrient Estimation |
| topic | Computation and Language Artificial Intelligence |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.25774 |