Enregistré dans:
Détails bibliographiques
Auteurs principaux: Adamczyk, Tomasz, Mieleszczenko-Kowszewicz, Wiktoria, Bajcar, Beata, Chodak, Grzegorz, Szczęsny, Aleksander, Markiewicz, Maciej, Ostrowska, Karolina, Sawczuk, Aleksandra, Kazienko, Przemysław
Format: Preprint
Publié: 2026
Sujets:
Accès en ligne:https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.25932
Tags: Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
_version_ 1866911630044954624
author Adamczyk, Tomasz
Mieleszczenko-Kowszewicz, Wiktoria
Bajcar, Beata
Chodak, Grzegorz
Szczęsny, Aleksander
Markiewicz, Maciej
Ostrowska, Karolina
Sawczuk, Aleksandra
Kazienko, Przemysław
author_facet Adamczyk, Tomasz
Mieleszczenko-Kowszewicz, Wiktoria
Bajcar, Beata
Chodak, Grzegorz
Szczęsny, Aleksander
Markiewicz, Maciej
Ostrowska, Karolina
Sawczuk, Aleksandra
Kazienko, Przemysław
contents As Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly integrated into educational settings, understanding their potential biases is critical. This study examines sociodemographic biases in LLM-based educational counselling. We evaluate responses from six LLMs answering questions about 900 vignettes describing students in diverse circumstances. Each vignette is systematically tested across 14 sociodemographic identifiers - spanning race and gender, socioeconomic status, and immigrant background - along with a control condition, yielding 243,000 model responses. Our findings indicate that (1) all models exhibit measurable biases, (2) bias patterns partially align with documented human biases but diverge in notable ways, (3) the magnitude of these biases is strongly influenced by the precision of the student descriptions, where vague or minimal information amplifies disparities nearly threefold, while concrete, individualised metrics substantially reduce them, and (4) bias profiles vary substantially across models. These results demonstrate the importance of context-rich and personalised educational representations, suggesting that AI-driven educational decisions benefit from detailed student-specific information to promote fairness and equity.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2604_25932
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Sociodemographic Biases in Educational Counselling by Large Language Models
Adamczyk, Tomasz
Mieleszczenko-Kowszewicz, Wiktoria
Bajcar, Beata
Chodak, Grzegorz
Szczęsny, Aleksander
Markiewicz, Maciej
Ostrowska, Karolina
Sawczuk, Aleksandra
Kazienko, Przemysław
Computers and Society
Artificial Intelligence
As Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly integrated into educational settings, understanding their potential biases is critical. This study examines sociodemographic biases in LLM-based educational counselling. We evaluate responses from six LLMs answering questions about 900 vignettes describing students in diverse circumstances. Each vignette is systematically tested across 14 sociodemographic identifiers - spanning race and gender, socioeconomic status, and immigrant background - along with a control condition, yielding 243,000 model responses. Our findings indicate that (1) all models exhibit measurable biases, (2) bias patterns partially align with documented human biases but diverge in notable ways, (3) the magnitude of these biases is strongly influenced by the precision of the student descriptions, where vague or minimal information amplifies disparities nearly threefold, while concrete, individualised metrics substantially reduce them, and (4) bias profiles vary substantially across models. These results demonstrate the importance of context-rich and personalised educational representations, suggesting that AI-driven educational decisions benefit from detailed student-specific information to promote fairness and equity.
title Sociodemographic Biases in Educational Counselling by Large Language Models
topic Computers and Society
Artificial Intelligence
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.25932