Risk Assessments for Evasive Emergency Maneuvers in Autonomous Vehicles
Fuente:
arXiv
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2026
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866914515012026368 |
|---|---|
| author | Arab, Aliasghar Khaleghi, Milad Aslansefat, Koorosh |
| author_facet | Arab, Aliasghar Khaleghi, Milad Aslansefat, Koorosh |
| contents | This paper presents a systematic verification and validation (V\&V) framework for the Evasive Minimum Risk Maneuver (EMRM) feature in autonomous vehicles, addressing a critical gap in existing safety assessment methods. We introduce the first formally integrated pipeline that unifies Hazard Analysis and Risk Assessment (HARA), System-Theoretic Process Analysis (STPA), and Finite State Machine (FSM) modeling into a single traceable workflow specifically designed for EMRM V\&V. HARA and STPA are combined through a structured hazard-loss mapping to identify hazards and unsafe control actions; an FSM layer captures hazard-to-loss state transitions that neither method models individually; and the unified framework drives automated scenario generation with measurable parameter-space coverage. Applied to a T-junction EMRM case study, the framework guides 1{,}880 RRT-based simulations spanning ego speed, time-to-collision (TTC), and road friction, uncovering a key physical result: the T-junction geometry gives nearly equal difficulty to stopping and to navigating, so the intermediate mitigation mode occupies only 1.9\% of the feasible parameter space. EMRM steering strategies achieve 81\% collision-avoidance rate and reduce mean residual impact speed from 18.9~km/h to 9.0~km/h compared with emergency braking alone, while the framework attains 100\% hazard, UCA, and parameter-space coverage versus $\leq$1\% for traditional methods. These results demonstrate that the integrated HARA-STPA-FSM framework enables high-resolution, traceable EMRM V\&V that is not achievable with any single method in isolation. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2604_26050 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Risk Assessments for Evasive Emergency Maneuvers in Autonomous Vehicles Arab, Aliasghar Khaleghi, Milad Aslansefat, Koorosh Systems and Control This paper presents a systematic verification and validation (V\&V) framework for the Evasive Minimum Risk Maneuver (EMRM) feature in autonomous vehicles, addressing a critical gap in existing safety assessment methods. We introduce the first formally integrated pipeline that unifies Hazard Analysis and Risk Assessment (HARA), System-Theoretic Process Analysis (STPA), and Finite State Machine (FSM) modeling into a single traceable workflow specifically designed for EMRM V\&V. HARA and STPA are combined through a structured hazard-loss mapping to identify hazards and unsafe control actions; an FSM layer captures hazard-to-loss state transitions that neither method models individually; and the unified framework drives automated scenario generation with measurable parameter-space coverage. Applied to a T-junction EMRM case study, the framework guides 1{,}880 RRT-based simulations spanning ego speed, time-to-collision (TTC), and road friction, uncovering a key physical result: the T-junction geometry gives nearly equal difficulty to stopping and to navigating, so the intermediate mitigation mode occupies only 1.9\% of the feasible parameter space. EMRM steering strategies achieve 81\% collision-avoidance rate and reduce mean residual impact speed from 18.9~km/h to 9.0~km/h compared with emergency braking alone, while the framework attains 100\% hazard, UCA, and parameter-space coverage versus $\leq$1\% for traditional methods. These results demonstrate that the integrated HARA-STPA-FSM framework enables high-resolution, traceable EMRM V\&V that is not achievable with any single method in isolation. |
| title | Risk Assessments for Evasive Emergency Maneuvers in Autonomous Vehicles |
| topic | Systems and Control |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.26050 |