Quantamination: Dynamic Quantization Leaks Your Data Across the Batch
Fuente:
arXiv
Enregistré dans:
| Auteurs principaux: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Publié: |
2026
|
| Sujets: | |
| Accès en ligne: | |
| Tags: |
Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
|
| _version_ | 1866911632514351104 |
|---|---|
| author | Foerster, Hanna Shumailov, Ilia Zhang, Cheng Zhao, Yiren Hayes, Jamie Mullins, Robert |
| author_facet | Foerster, Hanna Shumailov, Ilia Zhang, Cheng Zhao, Yiren Hayes, Jamie Mullins, Robert |
| contents | Dynamic quantization emerged as a practical approach to increase the utilization and efficiency of the machine learning serving flow. Unlike static quantization, which applies quantization offline, dynamic quantization operates on tensors at run-time, adapting its parameters to the actual input data. Today's mainstream machine learning frameworks, including ML compilers and inference engines, frequently recommend dynamic quantization as an initial step for optimizing model serving. This is because dynamic quantization can significantly reduce memory usage and computational load, leading to faster token generation and improved model serving efficiency without substantial loss in model accuracy. In this paper, we reveal a critical vulnerability in dynamic quantization: an adversary can exploit such quantization strategy to steal sensitive user data placed in the same batch as the adversary's input. Our analysis demonstrates that dynamic quantization, when improperly implemented or configured, can create side channels that expose information about other inputs within the same batch. We call this phenomenon Quantamination, describing contamination from quantization. Specifically, we show that at least 4 of the most popular ML frameworks in use today either default to or can use configurations that leak data across the batch boundary. This data leakage, in theory, allows attackers to partially or even fully recover other users' batched input data, representing a serious privacy risk for existing ML serving frameworks. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2604_26505 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Quantamination: Dynamic Quantization Leaks Your Data Across the Batch Foerster, Hanna Shumailov, Ilia Zhang, Cheng Zhao, Yiren Hayes, Jamie Mullins, Robert Cryptography and Security Machine Learning Dynamic quantization emerged as a practical approach to increase the utilization and efficiency of the machine learning serving flow. Unlike static quantization, which applies quantization offline, dynamic quantization operates on tensors at run-time, adapting its parameters to the actual input data. Today's mainstream machine learning frameworks, including ML compilers and inference engines, frequently recommend dynamic quantization as an initial step for optimizing model serving. This is because dynamic quantization can significantly reduce memory usage and computational load, leading to faster token generation and improved model serving efficiency without substantial loss in model accuracy. In this paper, we reveal a critical vulnerability in dynamic quantization: an adversary can exploit such quantization strategy to steal sensitive user data placed in the same batch as the adversary's input. Our analysis demonstrates that dynamic quantization, when improperly implemented or configured, can create side channels that expose information about other inputs within the same batch. We call this phenomenon Quantamination, describing contamination from quantization. Specifically, we show that at least 4 of the most popular ML frameworks in use today either default to or can use configurations that leak data across the batch boundary. This data leakage, in theory, allows attackers to partially or even fully recover other users' batched input data, representing a serious privacy risk for existing ML serving frameworks. |
| title | Quantamination: Dynamic Quantization Leaks Your Data Across the Batch |
| topic | Cryptography and Security Machine Learning |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.26505 |