Measuring Choice Difficulty
Fuente:
arXiv
Salvato in:
| Autori principali: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Natura: | Preprint |
| Pubblicazione: |
2026
|
| Soggetti: | |
| Accesso online: | |
| Tags: |
Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
|
| _version_ | 1866909000867512320 |
|---|---|
| author | Chambers, Chris Masatolioglu, Yusufcan Natenzon, Paulo Raymond, Collin |
| author_facet | Chambers, Chris Masatolioglu, Yusufcan Natenzon, Paulo Raymond, Collin |
| contents | We provide a theoretical framework to understand how widely used measures of choice difficulty relate. In a binary-option Bayesian expected-utility framework, we show that three measures of difficulty, (i) understanding (ex-ante value), (ii) choice randomness, and (iii) confidence that the chosen option is ex post correct, are, in general, unrelated, and that this result extends to other potential measures like attenuation. We provide intuitive sufficient conditions which align the orders, using both restrictions on Blackwell experiments that capture well known classes (such as logit) and restrictions on payoffs and demonstrate that in psychophysical tasks that pay only for correctness, confidence coincides with understanding. We show willingness-to-accept to switch, when measured in utils, is equivalent to understanding. Our results suggest caution in interpreting measures of choice difficulty as well as the degree of portability between economics and psychophysics experiments |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2604_26761 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Measuring Choice Difficulty Chambers, Chris Masatolioglu, Yusufcan Natenzon, Paulo Raymond, Collin Theoretical Economics We provide a theoretical framework to understand how widely used measures of choice difficulty relate. In a binary-option Bayesian expected-utility framework, we show that three measures of difficulty, (i) understanding (ex-ante value), (ii) choice randomness, and (iii) confidence that the chosen option is ex post correct, are, in general, unrelated, and that this result extends to other potential measures like attenuation. We provide intuitive sufficient conditions which align the orders, using both restrictions on Blackwell experiments that capture well known classes (such as logit) and restrictions on payoffs and demonstrate that in psychophysical tasks that pay only for correctness, confidence coincides with understanding. We show willingness-to-accept to switch, when measured in utils, is equivalent to understanding. Our results suggest caution in interpreting measures of choice difficulty as well as the degree of portability between economics and psychophysics experiments |
| title | Measuring Choice Difficulty |
| topic | Theoretical Economics |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.26761 |