Path-Lock Expert: Separating Reasoning Mode in Hybrid Thinking via Architecture-Level Separation

Fuente: arXiv
Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Wang, Shouren, Yang, Wang, Ma, Chuang, Ganguly, Debargha, Singh, Vikash, Song, Chaoda, Li, Xinpeng, Long, Xianxuan, Chaudhary, Vipin, Han, Xiaotian
Format: Preprint
Veröffentlicht: 2026
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1866910194051579904
author Wang, Shouren
Yang, Wang
Ma, Chuang
Ganguly, Debargha
Singh, Vikash
Song, Chaoda
Li, Xinpeng
Long, Xianxuan
Chaudhary, Vipin
Han, Xiaotian
author_facet Wang, Shouren
Yang, Wang
Ma, Chuang
Ganguly, Debargha
Singh, Vikash
Song, Chaoda
Li, Xinpeng
Long, Xianxuan
Chaudhary, Vipin
Han, Xiaotian
contents Hybrid-thinking language models expose explicit think and no-think modes, but current designs do not separate them cleanly. Even in no-think mode, models often emit long and self-reflective responses, causing reasoning leakage. Existing work reduces this issue through better data curation and multi-stage training, yet leakage remains because both modes are still encoded in the same feed-forward parameters. We propose Path-Lock Expert (PLE), an architecture-level solution that replaces the single MLP in each decoder layer with two semantically locked experts, one for think and one for no-think, while keeping attention, embeddings, normalization, and the language-model head shared. A deterministic control-token router selects exactly one expert path for the entire sequence, so inference preserves the dense model's per-token computation pattern and each expert receives mode-pure updates during supervised fine-tuning. Across math and science reasoning benchmarks, PLE maintains strong think performance while producing a substantially stronger no-think mode that is more accurate, more concise, and far less prone to reasoning leakage. On Qwen3-4B, for example, PLE reduces no-think reflective tokens on AIME24 from 2.54 to 0.39 and improves no-think accuracy from 20.67% to 40.00%, all while preserving think-mode performance. These results suggest that controllable hybrid thinking is fundamentally an architectural problem, and separating mode-specific feed-forward pathways is a simple and effective solution.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2604_27201
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Path-Lock Expert: Separating Reasoning Mode in Hybrid Thinking via Architecture-Level Separation
Wang, Shouren
Yang, Wang
Ma, Chuang
Ganguly, Debargha
Singh, Vikash
Song, Chaoda
Li, Xinpeng
Long, Xianxuan
Chaudhary, Vipin
Han, Xiaotian
Computation and Language
Artificial Intelligence
Machine Learning
I.2.7
Hybrid-thinking language models expose explicit think and no-think modes, but current designs do not separate them cleanly. Even in no-think mode, models often emit long and self-reflective responses, causing reasoning leakage. Existing work reduces this issue through better data curation and multi-stage training, yet leakage remains because both modes are still encoded in the same feed-forward parameters. We propose Path-Lock Expert (PLE), an architecture-level solution that replaces the single MLP in each decoder layer with two semantically locked experts, one for think and one for no-think, while keeping attention, embeddings, normalization, and the language-model head shared. A deterministic control-token router selects exactly one expert path for the entire sequence, so inference preserves the dense model's per-token computation pattern and each expert receives mode-pure updates during supervised fine-tuning. Across math and science reasoning benchmarks, PLE maintains strong think performance while producing a substantially stronger no-think mode that is more accurate, more concise, and far less prone to reasoning leakage. On Qwen3-4B, for example, PLE reduces no-think reflective tokens on AIME24 from 2.54 to 0.39 and improves no-think accuracy from 20.67% to 40.00%, all while preserving think-mode performance. These results suggest that controllable hybrid thinking is fundamentally an architectural problem, and separating mode-specific feed-forward pathways is a simple and effective solution.
title Path-Lock Expert: Separating Reasoning Mode in Hybrid Thinking via Architecture-Level Separation
topic Computation and Language
Artificial Intelligence
Machine Learning
I.2.7
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.27201