Salvato in:
| Autore principale: | |
|---|---|
| Natura: | Preprint |
| Pubblicazione: |
2026
|
| Soggetti: | |
| Accesso online: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.27222 |
| Tags: |
Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
|
| _version_ | 1866918475247648768 |
|---|---|
| author | Matta, Cherif F. |
| author_facet | Matta, Cherif F. |
| contents | The chemical bond is a central organizing concept in chemistry, yet it is absent from the molecular Hamiltonian and no "bond operator" exists. Bonding is therefore not a primitive physical entity but a derived descriptor emerging from the quantum state. The logical consequences of this observation are revisited. Statements such as "bonding stabilizes structure" when taken literally risk circular reasoning (petitio principii), whereby bonding is inferred from a stationary structure and then invoked as its cause. The same caution applies to concepts such as steric repulsion, which is also a derived descriptor. Bonding accompanies stable or metastable states and correlates with their properties without constituting their cause. Illustrative examples are drawn from QTAIM, non-covalent interaction (NCI) approach, protein structure, and hydrogen-hydrogen bonding. Causation, language, and the autonomy of chemistry are also briefly discussed. The aim is not at all to diminish the role of bonding, but to place it at the correct logical level, that is, as a powerful, state-dependent descriptor that organizes, classifies, and predicts chemical behavior without serving as its fundamental cause. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2604_27222 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | The Great Chicken-and-Egg of Chemistry: Bonding vs. Stability Revisited Matta, Cherif F. Chemical Physics Quantum Physics The chemical bond is a central organizing concept in chemistry, yet it is absent from the molecular Hamiltonian and no "bond operator" exists. Bonding is therefore not a primitive physical entity but a derived descriptor emerging from the quantum state. The logical consequences of this observation are revisited. Statements such as "bonding stabilizes structure" when taken literally risk circular reasoning (petitio principii), whereby bonding is inferred from a stationary structure and then invoked as its cause. The same caution applies to concepts such as steric repulsion, which is also a derived descriptor. Bonding accompanies stable or metastable states and correlates with their properties without constituting their cause. Illustrative examples are drawn from QTAIM, non-covalent interaction (NCI) approach, protein structure, and hydrogen-hydrogen bonding. Causation, language, and the autonomy of chemistry are also briefly discussed. The aim is not at all to diminish the role of bonding, but to place it at the correct logical level, that is, as a powerful, state-dependent descriptor that organizes, classifies, and predicts chemical behavior without serving as its fundamental cause. |
| title | The Great Chicken-and-Egg of Chemistry: Bonding vs. Stability Revisited |
| topic | Chemical Physics Quantum Physics |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.27222 |