Do Sparse Autoencoders Capture Concept Manifolds?

Fuente: arXiv
Salvato in:
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autori principali: Bhalla, Usha, Fel, Thomas, Rager, Can, Feucht, Sheridan, Haklay, Tal, Wurgaft, Daniel, Boppana, Siddharth, Kowal, Matthew, Shyam, Vasudev, Merullo, Jack, Geiger, Atticus, Lubana, Ekdeep Singh
Natura: Preprint
Pubblicazione: 2026
Soggetti:
Accesso online:
Tags: Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
_version_ 1866914521696698368
author Bhalla, Usha
Fel, Thomas
Rager, Can
Feucht, Sheridan
Haklay, Tal
Wurgaft, Daniel
Boppana, Siddharth
Kowal, Matthew
Shyam, Vasudev
Merullo, Jack
Geiger, Atticus
Lubana, Ekdeep Singh
author_facet Bhalla, Usha
Fel, Thomas
Rager, Can
Feucht, Sheridan
Haklay, Tal
Wurgaft, Daniel
Boppana, Siddharth
Kowal, Matthew
Shyam, Vasudev
Merullo, Jack
Geiger, Atticus
Lubana, Ekdeep Singh
contents Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) are widely used to extract interpretable features from neural network representations, often under the implicit assumption that concepts correspond to independent linear directions. However, a growing body of evidence suggests that many concepts are instead organized along low-dimensional manifolds encoding continuous geometric relationships. This raises three basic questions: what does it mean for an SAE to capture a manifold, when do existing SAE architectures do so, and how? We develop a theoretical framework that answers these questions and show that SAEs can capture manifolds in two fundamentally different ways: globally, by allocating a compact group of atoms whose linear span contains the entire manifold, or locally, by distributing it across features that each selectively tile a restricted region of the underlying geometry. Empirically, we find that SAEs suboptimally recover continuous structures, mixing the global subspace and local tiling solutions in a fragmented regime we call dilution. This explains why manifold structure is rarely visible at the level of individual concepts and motivates post-hoc unsupervised discovery methods that search for coherent groups of atoms rather than isolated directions. More broadly, our results suggest that future representation learning methods should treat geometric objects, not just individual directions, as the basic units of interpretability.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2604_28119
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Do Sparse Autoencoders Capture Concept Manifolds?
Bhalla, Usha
Fel, Thomas
Rager, Can
Feucht, Sheridan
Haklay, Tal
Wurgaft, Daniel
Boppana, Siddharth
Kowal, Matthew
Shyam, Vasudev
Merullo, Jack
Geiger, Atticus
Lubana, Ekdeep Singh
Machine Learning
Artificial Intelligence
Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) are widely used to extract interpretable features from neural network representations, often under the implicit assumption that concepts correspond to independent linear directions. However, a growing body of evidence suggests that many concepts are instead organized along low-dimensional manifolds encoding continuous geometric relationships. This raises three basic questions: what does it mean for an SAE to capture a manifold, when do existing SAE architectures do so, and how? We develop a theoretical framework that answers these questions and show that SAEs can capture manifolds in two fundamentally different ways: globally, by allocating a compact group of atoms whose linear span contains the entire manifold, or locally, by distributing it across features that each selectively tile a restricted region of the underlying geometry. Empirically, we find that SAEs suboptimally recover continuous structures, mixing the global subspace and local tiling solutions in a fragmented regime we call dilution. This explains why manifold structure is rarely visible at the level of individual concepts and motivates post-hoc unsupervised discovery methods that search for coherent groups of atoms rather than isolated directions. More broadly, our results suggest that future representation learning methods should treat geometric objects, not just individual directions, as the basic units of interpretability.
title Do Sparse Autoencoders Capture Concept Manifolds?
topic Machine Learning
Artificial Intelligence
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.28119