Seeking Information with RAG-Assistants: Does Model Size Matter in Human-AI Collaborations?

Fuente: arXiv
Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Froma, Lennard C., Kouwenhoven, Tom, de Boer, Maaike H. T., Jonker, Catholijn M., van Duijn, Max J.
Format: Preprint
Veröffentlicht: 2026
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1866918477810368512
author Froma, Lennard C.
Kouwenhoven, Tom
de Boer, Maaike H. T.
Jonker, Catholijn M.
van Duijn, Max J.
author_facet Froma, Lennard C.
Kouwenhoven, Tom
de Boer, Maaike H. T.
Jonker, Catholijn M.
van Duijn, Max J.
contents Much research on LLMs has focused on increasing benchmark performance. However, the evaluation of such models in real-world collaborative human-AI workflows has stayed behind. This work evaluates a chatbot-style assistant based on Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) in a realistic multi-turn information-seeking scenario inspired by workplace settings where compliance with local legislation and secure handling of sensitive data are often key. Specifically, we examine the performance of humans (N=112) assisted by RAG-assistants compared to LLM-only or LLM+RAG baselines. In this setting, we investigate how underlying model size (3B, 8B, and 70B) shapes the human-AI collaborative dynamic and how it influences perceived usability and satisfaction. Results show that the performance gain of human-AI collaboration over the model-only baselines is significant, irrespective of model size, suggesting that hybrid systems are beneficial in information-seeking scenarios. Interestingly, however, perceived usability and satisfaction among participants showed little difference across model sizes. This demonstrates a nuanced trade-off between model size, performance, and user perception. Our work highlights the added value of evaluating AI applications in actual multi-turn interactions with human users, looking at usability and satisfaction besides accuracy, rather than focusing on benchmark performance only.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2605_00964
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Seeking Information with RAG-Assistants: Does Model Size Matter in Human-AI Collaborations?
Froma, Lennard C.
Kouwenhoven, Tom
de Boer, Maaike H. T.
Jonker, Catholijn M.
van Duijn, Max J.
Information Retrieval
Artificial Intelligence
Human-Computer Interaction
Much research on LLMs has focused on increasing benchmark performance. However, the evaluation of such models in real-world collaborative human-AI workflows has stayed behind. This work evaluates a chatbot-style assistant based on Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) in a realistic multi-turn information-seeking scenario inspired by workplace settings where compliance with local legislation and secure handling of sensitive data are often key. Specifically, we examine the performance of humans (N=112) assisted by RAG-assistants compared to LLM-only or LLM+RAG baselines. In this setting, we investigate how underlying model size (3B, 8B, and 70B) shapes the human-AI collaborative dynamic and how it influences perceived usability and satisfaction. Results show that the performance gain of human-AI collaboration over the model-only baselines is significant, irrespective of model size, suggesting that hybrid systems are beneficial in information-seeking scenarios. Interestingly, however, perceived usability and satisfaction among participants showed little difference across model sizes. This demonstrates a nuanced trade-off between model size, performance, and user perception. Our work highlights the added value of evaluating AI applications in actual multi-turn interactions with human users, looking at usability and satisfaction besides accuracy, rather than focusing on benchmark performance only.
title Seeking Information with RAG-Assistants: Does Model Size Matter in Human-AI Collaborations?
topic Information Retrieval
Artificial Intelligence
Human-Computer Interaction
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00964