Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guey, William, Zhang, Wei, Bougault, Pierrick, Wang, Yi, Ucar, Bertan, de Moura, Vitor D., Gomes, José O.
Formato: Preprint
Publicado: 2026
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.01451
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
_version_ 1866910185330573312
author Guey, William
Zhang, Wei
Bougault, Pierrick
Wang, Yi
Ucar, Bertan
de Moura, Vitor D.
Gomes, José O.
author_facet Guey, William
Zhang, Wei
Bougault, Pierrick
Wang, Yi
Ucar, Bertan
de Moura, Vitor D.
Gomes, José O.
contents Large language models (LLMs) are rapidly being integrated into high-stakes public safety systems, including emergency call triage and dispatch decision support, yet their demographic fairness in this context remains largely untested. Here we introduce a cross-lingual audit framework that operationalizes the Police Priority Dispatch System as a five-level ordinal classification task and applies a controlled minimal-pair design to isolate the effect of demographic cues. Across 19,800 model outputs spanning 11 frontier models, 15 scenario pairs, three demographic categories (religious appearance, gender, and race), and two languages (English and Mandarin Chinese), we find that demographic bias emerges systematically when incident severity is ambiguous but largely disappears when the operational priority is clearly determined by call content. Bias magnitude varies by demographic axis, with the largest effects observed for religious appearance, followed by gender and race. Critically, bias does not transfer consistently across languages: gender bias is substantially amplified in Mandarin Chinese, whereas race bias is more pronounced in English, revealing cross-lingual asymmetries that aggregate analyses obscure. In several scenarios, demographic cues produce counter-directional effects, challenging simple stereotype-amplification accounts of model behavior. These findings suggest that bias in LLM-based dispatch is not a fixed property of models alone, but arises from the interaction between demographic signals, contextual ambiguity, and language. Beyond these empirical results, the proposed framework provides a scalable audit infrastructure that enables deploying agencies to evaluate candidate models on jurisdiction-relevant scenarios prior to real-world adoption.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2605_01451
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Auditing demographic bias in AI-based emergency police dispatch: a cross-lingual evaluation of eleven large language models
Guey, William
Zhang, Wei
Bougault, Pierrick
Wang, Yi
Ucar, Bertan
de Moura, Vitor D.
Gomes, José O.
Computation and Language
Large language models (LLMs) are rapidly being integrated into high-stakes public safety systems, including emergency call triage and dispatch decision support, yet their demographic fairness in this context remains largely untested. Here we introduce a cross-lingual audit framework that operationalizes the Police Priority Dispatch System as a five-level ordinal classification task and applies a controlled minimal-pair design to isolate the effect of demographic cues. Across 19,800 model outputs spanning 11 frontier models, 15 scenario pairs, three demographic categories (religious appearance, gender, and race), and two languages (English and Mandarin Chinese), we find that demographic bias emerges systematically when incident severity is ambiguous but largely disappears when the operational priority is clearly determined by call content. Bias magnitude varies by demographic axis, with the largest effects observed for religious appearance, followed by gender and race. Critically, bias does not transfer consistently across languages: gender bias is substantially amplified in Mandarin Chinese, whereas race bias is more pronounced in English, revealing cross-lingual asymmetries that aggregate analyses obscure. In several scenarios, demographic cues produce counter-directional effects, challenging simple stereotype-amplification accounts of model behavior. These findings suggest that bias in LLM-based dispatch is not a fixed property of models alone, but arises from the interaction between demographic signals, contextual ambiguity, and language. Beyond these empirical results, the proposed framework provides a scalable audit infrastructure that enables deploying agencies to evaluate candidate models on jurisdiction-relevant scenarios prior to real-world adoption.
title Auditing demographic bias in AI-based emergency police dispatch: a cross-lingual evaluation of eleven large language models
topic Computation and Language
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.01451