CyberAId: AI-Driven Cybersecurity for Financial Service Providers

Fuente: arXiv
Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fatouros, George, Makridis, Georgios, Soldatos, John, Kyriazis, Dimosthenis, Malo, Pedro, Kousiouris, George, Ledakis, Giannis, Kachrimani, Louiza, Rizomiliotis, Panagiotis, Almeida, Bruno, Tomkou, Despina, Metaxas, Kostas, Ilias, Konstantinos, Gkizelis, Christos, de Gooyert, Ernstjan, Babazadeh, Amin, Mavrogiorgos, Kostis, Paraskevoulakou, Pepi, Xenakis, Christos, Chouchoulis, Giannis, Tripodi, Konstantina
Formato: Preprint
Publicado: 2026
Materias:
Acceso en línea:
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
_version_ 1866913084611756032
author Fatouros, George
Makridis, Georgios
Soldatos, John
Kyriazis, Dimosthenis
Malo, Pedro
Kousiouris, George
Ledakis, Giannis
Kachrimani, Louiza
Rizomiliotis, Panagiotis
Almeida, Bruno
Tomkou, Despina
Metaxas, Kostas
Ilias, Konstantinos
Gkizelis, Christos
de Gooyert, Ernstjan
Babazadeh, Amin
Mavrogiorgos, Kostis
Paraskevoulakou, Pepi
Xenakis, Christos
Chouchoulis, Giannis
Tripodi, Konstantina
author_facet Fatouros, George
Makridis, Georgios
Soldatos, John
Kyriazis, Dimosthenis
Malo, Pedro
Kousiouris, George
Ledakis, Giannis
Kachrimani, Louiza
Rizomiliotis, Panagiotis
Almeida, Bruno
Tomkou, Despina
Metaxas, Kostas
Ilias, Konstantinos
Gkizelis, Christos
de Gooyert, Ernstjan
Babazadeh, Amin
Mavrogiorgos, Kostis
Paraskevoulakou, Pepi
Xenakis, Christos
Chouchoulis, Giannis
Tripodi, Konstantina
contents European financial institutions face mounting regulatory pressure while their security operations centres remain constrained not by data or staffing but by reasoning capacity: enterprise SIEMs cover only a fraction of MITRE ATT&CK techniques, two thirds of SOC teams cannot keep pace with alert volumes, and the majority of breaches are preceded by alerts that are generated but never investigated. Frontier large language models now achieve state-of-the-art results on isolated cybersecurity tasks (one-day vulnerability exploitation, code-level patching, intrusion detection) yet no narrow win constitutes a platform that can compose across functions, persist multi-tenant state, map findings to regulatory regimes and survive an audit. This position paper argues that the right unit of construction is a hybrid multi-agent system in which specialised LLM subagents reason over classical SIEM/XDR telemetry rather than replacing it, share accumulated agent state across institutions through privacy-preserving federation, and can connect to complementary capability packs such as quantum-based authentication, digital twins for adversarial validation, and eBPF-based kernel telemetry. We present CyberAId, a model-agnostic, on-premise-deployable platform in which a Main Agent coordination layer, a Reporting capability, and specialist subagents operate within a shared runtime under bounded human-in-the-loop autonomy, organised around four falsifiable design principles, and aligned with relevant regulations. CyberAId will be validated at four representative financial use cases (client impersonation, anti-money-laundering for payment service providers, retail-banking incident response, and high-frequency-trading resilience) and propose skill-based agent adaptation as the most promising research direction for turning each deployment into a contribution to a continuously refined collective defence.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2605_01892
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle CyberAId: AI-Driven Cybersecurity for Financial Service Providers
Fatouros, George
Makridis, Georgios
Soldatos, John
Kyriazis, Dimosthenis
Malo, Pedro
Kousiouris, George
Ledakis, Giannis
Kachrimani, Louiza
Rizomiliotis, Panagiotis
Almeida, Bruno
Tomkou, Despina
Metaxas, Kostas
Ilias, Konstantinos
Gkizelis, Christos
de Gooyert, Ernstjan
Babazadeh, Amin
Mavrogiorgos, Kostis
Paraskevoulakou, Pepi
Xenakis, Christos
Chouchoulis, Giannis
Tripodi, Konstantina
Artificial Intelligence
Cryptography and Security
Information Retrieval
68T42, 68T05, 94A60
I.2.11; K.6.5; I.2.1; C.2.0
European financial institutions face mounting regulatory pressure while their security operations centres remain constrained not by data or staffing but by reasoning capacity: enterprise SIEMs cover only a fraction of MITRE ATT&CK techniques, two thirds of SOC teams cannot keep pace with alert volumes, and the majority of breaches are preceded by alerts that are generated but never investigated. Frontier large language models now achieve state-of-the-art results on isolated cybersecurity tasks (one-day vulnerability exploitation, code-level patching, intrusion detection) yet no narrow win constitutes a platform that can compose across functions, persist multi-tenant state, map findings to regulatory regimes and survive an audit. This position paper argues that the right unit of construction is a hybrid multi-agent system in which specialised LLM subagents reason over classical SIEM/XDR telemetry rather than replacing it, share accumulated agent state across institutions through privacy-preserving federation, and can connect to complementary capability packs such as quantum-based authentication, digital twins for adversarial validation, and eBPF-based kernel telemetry. We present CyberAId, a model-agnostic, on-premise-deployable platform in which a Main Agent coordination layer, a Reporting capability, and specialist subagents operate within a shared runtime under bounded human-in-the-loop autonomy, organised around four falsifiable design principles, and aligned with relevant regulations. CyberAId will be validated at four representative financial use cases (client impersonation, anti-money-laundering for payment service providers, retail-banking incident response, and high-frequency-trading resilience) and propose skill-based agent adaptation as the most promising research direction for turning each deployment into a contribution to a continuously refined collective defence.
title CyberAId: AI-Driven Cybersecurity for Financial Service Providers
topic Artificial Intelligence
Cryptography and Security
Information Retrieval
68T42, 68T05, 94A60
I.2.11; K.6.5; I.2.1; C.2.0
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.01892