Ultrasound Vision-Language Alignment via Contrastive Learning
Fuente:
arXiv
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2026
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| _version_ | 1866911643131183104 |
|---|---|
| author | Lyu, Zhuoyang Zhang, Yiyang Wang, Tongxin Lan, Ruirui |
| author_facet | Lyu, Zhuoyang Zhang, Yiyang Wang, Tongxin Lan, Ruirui |
| contents | Ultrasound foundation models have achieved strong performance on structured prediction tasks but remain exclusively vision-based, limiting zero-shot and few-shot transfer to novel tasks where task-specific annotation is scarce. We address this gap with EchoCare-CLIP, a CLIP-style dual-encoder contrastive framework that aligns ultrasound images with clinical text in a shared embedding space. We curate a multi-organ corpus of over 16K image-text pairs spanning breast, liver, lung, and thyroid, with over 78% of captions derived from expert-annotated reports, and complement the remainder with a three-tier template-based and LLM-based caption generation pipeline. We evaluate model configurations spanning two text encoder families (CLIP, BioClinicalBERT) and two caption strategies (template-based, LLM-generated) against OpenAI CLIP and BiomedCLIP baselines. Our trained models consistently improve cross-modal alignment over baselines, with the best configuration achieving a paired alignment score of 0.682. However, stronger alignment does not guarantee better downstream performance: CLIP-based variants with partial fine-tuning achieve the strongest zero-shot classification on external held-out datasets (0.709 on BUSI; 0.626 on AULI), while full end-to-end fine-tuning degrades transfer due to overfitting. On linear probing and few-shot adaptation, model rankings are dataset-dependent, reflecting a trade-off between domain adaptation and representational generalizability. We further show that template-based captions match or outperform LLM-generated captions, suggesting lexical diversity is not a proxy for caption quality. Taken together, our results demonstrate that ultrasound vision-language alignment is achievable from public data alone, but robust clinical transfer requires careful balancing of domain adaptation, encoder capacity, and caption supervision quality. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2605_02126 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Ultrasound Vision-Language Alignment via Contrastive Learning Lyu, Zhuoyang Zhang, Yiyang Wang, Tongxin Lan, Ruirui Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Machine Learning Ultrasound foundation models have achieved strong performance on structured prediction tasks but remain exclusively vision-based, limiting zero-shot and few-shot transfer to novel tasks where task-specific annotation is scarce. We address this gap with EchoCare-CLIP, a CLIP-style dual-encoder contrastive framework that aligns ultrasound images with clinical text in a shared embedding space. We curate a multi-organ corpus of over 16K image-text pairs spanning breast, liver, lung, and thyroid, with over 78% of captions derived from expert-annotated reports, and complement the remainder with a three-tier template-based and LLM-based caption generation pipeline. We evaluate model configurations spanning two text encoder families (CLIP, BioClinicalBERT) and two caption strategies (template-based, LLM-generated) against OpenAI CLIP and BiomedCLIP baselines. Our trained models consistently improve cross-modal alignment over baselines, with the best configuration achieving a paired alignment score of 0.682. However, stronger alignment does not guarantee better downstream performance: CLIP-based variants with partial fine-tuning achieve the strongest zero-shot classification on external held-out datasets (0.709 on BUSI; 0.626 on AULI), while full end-to-end fine-tuning degrades transfer due to overfitting. On linear probing and few-shot adaptation, model rankings are dataset-dependent, reflecting a trade-off between domain adaptation and representational generalizability. We further show that template-based captions match or outperform LLM-generated captions, suggesting lexical diversity is not a proxy for caption quality. Taken together, our results demonstrate that ultrasound vision-language alignment is achievable from public data alone, but robust clinical transfer requires careful balancing of domain adaptation, encoder capacity, and caption supervision quality. |
| title | Ultrasound Vision-Language Alignment via Contrastive Learning |
| topic | Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Machine Learning |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02126 |