Copertina

These Aren't the Reviews You're Looking For How Humans Review AI-Generated Pull Requests

Fuente: arXiv

Salvato in:

Dettagli Bibliografici
Autori principali:	Duma, Kacper, Wróblewski, Patryk, Bobińska, Jagoda, Winiarska, Julia, Przymus, Piotr
Natura:	Preprint
Pubblicazione:	2026
Soggetti:	Software Engineering
Accesso online:	Acceder al recurso
Tags:	Aggiungi Tag Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!

Documenti analoghi

How Do Developers Use Code Suggestions in Pull Request Reviews?
di: Bouraffa, Abir, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

How AI Coding Agents Communicate: A Study of Pull Request Description Characteristics and Human Review Responses
di: Watanabe, Kan, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

Early-Stage Prediction of Review Effort in AI-Generated Pull Requests
di: Minh, Dao Sy Duy, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

Insights into Security-Related AI-Generated Pull Requests
di: Rabbi, Md Fazle, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

The Quiet Contributions: Insights into AI-Generated Silent Pull Requests
di: Hasan, S M Mahedy, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

Generative AI for Pull Request Descriptions: Adoption, Impact, and Developer Interventions
di: Xiao, Tao, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

Humans Integrate, Agents Fix: How Agent-Authored Pull Requests Are Referenced in Practice
di: Khemissi, Islem, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

SWE-PRBench: Benchmarking AI Code Review Quality Against Pull Request Feedback
di: Kumar, Deepak
Pubblicazione: (2026)

Sphinx: Benchmarking and Modeling for LLM-Driven Pull Request Review
di: Zhang, Daoan, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

On the Footprints of Reviewer Bots Feedback on Agentic Pull Requests in OSS GitHub Repositories
di: Fatima, Syeda Kaneez, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

Quality Gatekeepers: Investigating the Effects ofCode Review Bots on Pull Request Activities
di: Wessel, Mairieli, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2021)

Who Said CVE? How Vulnerability Identifiers Are Mentioned by Humans, Bots, and Agents in Pull Requests
di: Rooijendijk, Pien, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love ChatGPT
di: Przymus, Piotr, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Let's Make Every Pull Request Meaningful: An Empirical Analysis of Developer and Agentic Pull Requests
di: Yoshioka, Haruhiko, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

Collaborator or Assistant? How AI Coding Agents Partition Work Across Pull Request Lifecycles
di: Jo, Young, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

From Industry Claims to Empirical Reality: An Empirical Study of Code Review Agents in Pull Requests
di: Chowdhury, Kowshik, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

The Value of Effective Pull Request Description
di: Pirouzkhah, Shirin, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

Wolves in the Repository: A Software Engineering Analysis of the XZ Utils Supply Chain Attack
di: Przymus, Piotr, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Bugdar: AI-Augmented Secure Code Review for GitHub Pull Requests
di: Naulty, John, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Human-Agent versus Human Pull Requests: A Testing-Focused Characterization and Comparison
di: Milanese, Roberto, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

Quality and Security Signals in AI-Generated Python Refactoring Pull Requests
di: Almukhtar, Mohamed, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

Adversarial Bug Reports as a Security Risk in Language Model-Based Automated Program Repair
di: Przymus, Piotr, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

How Do Agentic AI Systems Deal With Software Energy Concerns? A Pull Request-Based Study
di: Mitul, Tanjum Motin, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

How Do Agentic AI Systems Address Performance Optimizations? A BERTopic-Based Analysis of Pull Requests
di: Opu, Md Nahidul Islam, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

When AI Teammates Meet Code Review: Collaboration Signals Shaping the Integration of Agent-Authored Pull Requests
di: Nachuma, Costain, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

Evaluating the Impact of Data Cleaning on the Quality of Generated Pull Request Descriptions
di: Tire, Kutay, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Programmers Aren't Obsolete Yet: A Syllabus for Teaching CS Students to Responsibly Use Large Language Models for Code Generation
di: Cipriano, Bruno Pereira, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Empirical Analysis of Pull Requests for Google Summer of Code
di: Popoola, Saheed
Pubblicazione: (2024)

GitHub Actions: The Impact on the Pull Request Process
di: Wessel, Mairieli, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2022)

The Impact of Documentation on Test Engagement in Pull Requests in OSS
di: Amore, Teal, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

Comparing AI Coding Agents: A Task-Stratified Analysis of Pull Request Acceptance
di: Pinna, Giovanni, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

Why Are Agentic Pull Requests Merged or Rejected? An Empirical Study
di: Peralta, Sien Reeve O., et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

A Study of Library Usage in Agent-Authored Pull Requests
di: Twist, Lukas, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Code Change Characteristics and Description Alignment: A Comparative Study of Agentic versus Human Pull Requests
di: Pham, Dung, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

On the Use of Agentic Coding: An Empirical Study of Pull Requests on GitHub
di: Watanabe, Miku, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Analyzing Message-Code Inconsistency in AI Coding Agent-Authored Pull Requests
di: Gong, Jingzhi, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

More Code, Less Reuse: Investigating Code Quality and Reviewer Sentiment towards AI-generated Pull Requests
di: Huang, Haoming, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

Improving Merge Pipeline Throughput in Continuous Integration via Pull Request Prioritization
di: Jungwirth, Maximilian, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Change And Cover: Last-Mile, Pull Request-Based Regression Test Augmentation
di: Zhou, Zitong, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

Security in the Age of AI Teammates: An Empirical Study of Agentic Pull Requests on GitHub
di: Siddiq, Mohammed Latif, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)