AI-Augmented Science and the New Institutional Scarcities
Fuente:
arXiv
Salvato in:
| Autore principale: | |
|---|---|
| Natura: | Preprint |
| Pubblicazione: |
2026
|
| Soggetti: | |
| Accesso online: | |
| Tags: |
Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
|
| _version_ | 1866916042110926848 |
|---|---|
| author | Lovén, Lauri |
| author_facet | Lovén, Lauri |
| contents | Competent-looking judgment, including selecting, ranking, attributing, and certifying, is now produced at scale at marginal cost approaching zero, inverting the dominant economics-of-AI reading that treats judgment as the scarce complement to cheap prediction. Scientific institutions are among those most exposed, because manufacturing legitimate judgment is their primary product rather than one input among many, so they do not merely adapt to AI; they compete with it for the same functional role. Four complements then become scarce and load-bearing for AI-augmented science: verified signal, legitimacy, authentic provenance, and integration capacity (the community's tolerance for delegated cognition). Of these four, integration capacity is the least developed for scientific institutions and the most binding: no improvement in AI tooling can buy it. The frontier for AI-augmented science is not acceleration; it is the redesign of the certifying infrastructure around these new scarcities. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2605_02566 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | AI-Augmented Science and the New Institutional Scarcities Lovén, Lauri Computers and Society K.4.1; K.4.2; I.2.0 Competent-looking judgment, including selecting, ranking, attributing, and certifying, is now produced at scale at marginal cost approaching zero, inverting the dominant economics-of-AI reading that treats judgment as the scarce complement to cheap prediction. Scientific institutions are among those most exposed, because manufacturing legitimate judgment is their primary product rather than one input among many, so they do not merely adapt to AI; they compete with it for the same functional role. Four complements then become scarce and load-bearing for AI-augmented science: verified signal, legitimacy, authentic provenance, and integration capacity (the community's tolerance for delegated cognition). Of these four, integration capacity is the least developed for scientific institutions and the most binding: no improvement in AI tooling can buy it. The frontier for AI-augmented science is not acceleration; it is the redesign of the certifying infrastructure around these new scarcities. |
| title | AI-Augmented Science and the New Institutional Scarcities |
| topic | Computers and Society K.4.1; K.4.2; I.2.0 |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02566 |