Counterfactual Reasoning in Automated Planning
Fuente:
arXiv
Salvato in:
| Autori principali: | , , |
|---|---|
| Natura: | Preprint |
| Pubblicazione: |
2026
|
| Soggetti: | |
| Accesso online: | |
| Tags: |
Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
|
| _version_ | 1866909012495171584 |
|---|---|
| author | Pozanco, Alberto Borrajo, Daniel Veloso, Manuela |
| author_facet | Pozanco, Alberto Borrajo, Daniel Veloso, Manuela |
| contents | Automated planning traditionally assumes that all aspects of a planning task (initial state, goals, and available actions) are fully specified in advance, an approach well-suited to domains with fixed rules and deterministic execution. However, real-world planning often requires flexibility, allowing for deviations from the original task parameters in response to unforeseen circumstances or to improve outcomes. This paper surveys existing works on counterfactual reasoning in automated planning, categorizing them by what elements are changed, when the reasoning is triggered, and why and how these changes are made. We conclude by discussing key findings and outlining open research questions to guide future work in this area. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2605_02603 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Counterfactual Reasoning in Automated Planning Pozanco, Alberto Borrajo, Daniel Veloso, Manuela Artificial Intelligence Automated planning traditionally assumes that all aspects of a planning task (initial state, goals, and available actions) are fully specified in advance, an approach well-suited to domains with fixed rules and deterministic execution. However, real-world planning often requires flexibility, allowing for deviations from the original task parameters in response to unforeseen circumstances or to improve outcomes. This paper surveys existing works on counterfactual reasoning in automated planning, categorizing them by what elements are changed, when the reasoning is triggered, and why and how these changes are made. We conclude by discussing key findings and outlining open research questions to guide future work in this area. |
| title | Counterfactual Reasoning in Automated Planning |
| topic | Artificial Intelligence |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02603 |