Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2026
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.04012 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866911669199831040 |
|---|---|
| author | Breda, Joseph Yousif, Fadi Hawkins, Beszel Cotoi, Marinela Liu, Miao Luo, Ray Chen, Po-Hsuan Cameron Schaekermann, Mike Schmidgall, Samuel Liu, Xin Narayanswamy, Girish Solomon, Samuel Xu, Maxwell A. Fan, Xiaoran Shangguan, Longfei Wang, Anran Daryani, Bhavna Herkenham, Buddy Tan, Cara Malhotra, Mark Patel, Shwetak Hernandez, John B. Duong, Quang Liu, Yun Wasson, Zach Antos, Dimitrios Lou, Bob Thompson, Matthew Richina, Jonathan Pathak, Anupam Young-Lin, Nichole Sunshine, Jake McDuff, Daniel |
| author_facet | Breda, Joseph Yousif, Fadi Hawkins, Beszel Cotoi, Marinela Liu, Miao Luo, Ray Chen, Po-Hsuan Cameron Schaekermann, Mike Schmidgall, Samuel Liu, Xin Narayanswamy, Girish Solomon, Samuel Xu, Maxwell A. Fan, Xiaoran Shangguan, Longfei Wang, Anran Daryani, Bhavna Herkenham, Buddy Tan, Cara Malhotra, Mark Patel, Shwetak Hernandez, John B. Duong, Quang Liu, Yun Wasson, Zach Antos, Dimitrios Lou, Bob Thompson, Matthew Richina, Jonathan Pathak, Anupam Young-Lin, Nichole Sunshine, Jake McDuff, Daniel |
| contents | Language models excel at diagnostic assessments on curated medical case-studies and vignettes, performing on par with, or better than, clinical professionals. However, existing studies focus on complex scenarios with rich context making it difficult to draw conclusions about how these systems perform for patients reporting symptoms in everyday life. We deployed SymptomAI, a set of conversational AI agents for end-to-end patient interviewing and differential diagnosis (DDx), via the Fitbit app in a study that randomized participants (N=13,917) to interact with five AI agents. This corpus captures diverse communication and a realistic distribution of illnesses from a real world population. A subset of 1,228 participants reported a clinician-provided diagnosis, and 517 of these were further evaluated by a panel of clinicians during over 250 hours of annotation. SymptomAI DDx were significantly more accurate (OR = 2.56, p < 0.001) than those from independent clinicians given the same dialogue in a blinded randomized comparison. Moreover, agentic strategies which conduct a dedicated symptom interview that elicit additional symptom information before providing a diagnosis, perform substantially better than baseline, user-guided conversations (p < 0.001). An auxiliary analysis on 1,509 conversations from a general US population panel validated that these results generalize beyond wearable device users. We used SymptomAI diagnoses as labels for all 13,917 participants to analyze over 500,000 days of wearable metrics across nearly 400 unique conditions. We identified strong associations between acute infections and physiological shifts (e.g., OR > 7 for influenza). While limited by self-reported ground truth, these results demonstrate the benefits of a dedicated and complete symptom interview compared to a user-guided symptom discussion, which is the default of most consumer LLMs. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2605_04012 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | SymptomAI: Toward a Conversational AI Agent for Everyday Symptom Assessment Breda, Joseph Yousif, Fadi Hawkins, Beszel Cotoi, Marinela Liu, Miao Luo, Ray Chen, Po-Hsuan Cameron Schaekermann, Mike Schmidgall, Samuel Liu, Xin Narayanswamy, Girish Solomon, Samuel Xu, Maxwell A. Fan, Xiaoran Shangguan, Longfei Wang, Anran Daryani, Bhavna Herkenham, Buddy Tan, Cara Malhotra, Mark Patel, Shwetak Hernandez, John B. Duong, Quang Liu, Yun Wasson, Zach Antos, Dimitrios Lou, Bob Thompson, Matthew Richina, Jonathan Pathak, Anupam Young-Lin, Nichole Sunshine, Jake McDuff, Daniel Artificial Intelligence Language models excel at diagnostic assessments on curated medical case-studies and vignettes, performing on par with, or better than, clinical professionals. However, existing studies focus on complex scenarios with rich context making it difficult to draw conclusions about how these systems perform for patients reporting symptoms in everyday life. We deployed SymptomAI, a set of conversational AI agents for end-to-end patient interviewing and differential diagnosis (DDx), via the Fitbit app in a study that randomized participants (N=13,917) to interact with five AI agents. This corpus captures diverse communication and a realistic distribution of illnesses from a real world population. A subset of 1,228 participants reported a clinician-provided diagnosis, and 517 of these were further evaluated by a panel of clinicians during over 250 hours of annotation. SymptomAI DDx were significantly more accurate (OR = 2.56, p < 0.001) than those from independent clinicians given the same dialogue in a blinded randomized comparison. Moreover, agentic strategies which conduct a dedicated symptom interview that elicit additional symptom information before providing a diagnosis, perform substantially better than baseline, user-guided conversations (p < 0.001). An auxiliary analysis on 1,509 conversations from a general US population panel validated that these results generalize beyond wearable device users. We used SymptomAI diagnoses as labels for all 13,917 participants to analyze over 500,000 days of wearable metrics across nearly 400 unique conditions. We identified strong associations between acute infections and physiological shifts (e.g., OR > 7 for influenza). While limited by self-reported ground truth, these results demonstrate the benefits of a dedicated and complete symptom interview compared to a user-guided symptom discussion, which is the default of most consumer LLMs. |
| title | SymptomAI: Toward a Conversational AI Agent for Everyday Symptom Assessment |
| topic | Artificial Intelligence |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.04012 |