Ensemble modeling of Coronal Mass Ejection dynamics and forecasts at 1 AU with a semi-analytic flux-rope model
Fuente:
arXiv
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Preprint |
| Publicado: |
2026
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| _version_ | 1866914533344280576 |
|---|---|
| author | Stamkos, S. Patsourakos, S. Vourlidas, A. Paouris, E. |
| author_facet | Stamkos, S. Patsourakos, S. Vourlidas, A. Paouris, E. |
| contents | This study quantifies how uncertainty in physically meaningful coronal mass ejection (CME) and solar-wind inputs propagates into forecast-relevant diagnostics from eruption to 1 AU. We use a semi-analytic erupting flux rope (EFR) model to simulate CME initiation and Sun-to-1 AU propagation under Lorentz, gravitational, and drag forces, driven by a prescribed time-dependent poloidal-flux injection. Relative to the original EFR formulation, we include sheath and pile-up effects through an effective mass and update the drag term for CME solar-wind coupling. The model is embedded in a Monte Carlo framework with truncated-normal sampling of key eruption and background solar-wind inputs. Across six CME events, the ensembles show event-dependent dispersion in the 1 AU diagnostics. For +/- 20% input sampling, all spreads are 1-sigma ensemble standard deviations. The time-of-arrival spread is 2.4-7.7 h and is mainly controlled by the poloidal-flux injection history, upstream wind speed, and drag coefficient. The leading-edge speed spread is 28-53 km/s and is primarily controlled by background-flow properties. Magnetic-field diagnostics show two regimes: the sheath field is relatively tightly distributed, with a spread of 1-3.5 nT and sensitivity to upstream wind, size, and expansion scaling, whereas the internal flux-rope field has a larger spread of 1-7.6 nT and is governed mainly by eruption-driving and flux-content parameters. The impact-duration spread is 2.4-6.3 h and is controlled mostly by geometric size and expansion scaling, with additional sensitivity to the driving timescale. These results establish a quantitative link between EFR input uncertainties and the resulting spread in CME arrival and impact diagnostics, identifying the physical parameters that most strongly limit forecast precision at 1 AU. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2605_04284 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Ensemble modeling of Coronal Mass Ejection dynamics and forecasts at 1 AU with a semi-analytic flux-rope model Stamkos, S. Patsourakos, S. Vourlidas, A. Paouris, E. Solar and Stellar Astrophysics This study quantifies how uncertainty in physically meaningful coronal mass ejection (CME) and solar-wind inputs propagates into forecast-relevant diagnostics from eruption to 1 AU. We use a semi-analytic erupting flux rope (EFR) model to simulate CME initiation and Sun-to-1 AU propagation under Lorentz, gravitational, and drag forces, driven by a prescribed time-dependent poloidal-flux injection. Relative to the original EFR formulation, we include sheath and pile-up effects through an effective mass and update the drag term for CME solar-wind coupling. The model is embedded in a Monte Carlo framework with truncated-normal sampling of key eruption and background solar-wind inputs. Across six CME events, the ensembles show event-dependent dispersion in the 1 AU diagnostics. For +/- 20% input sampling, all spreads are 1-sigma ensemble standard deviations. The time-of-arrival spread is 2.4-7.7 h and is mainly controlled by the poloidal-flux injection history, upstream wind speed, and drag coefficient. The leading-edge speed spread is 28-53 km/s and is primarily controlled by background-flow properties. Magnetic-field diagnostics show two regimes: the sheath field is relatively tightly distributed, with a spread of 1-3.5 nT and sensitivity to upstream wind, size, and expansion scaling, whereas the internal flux-rope field has a larger spread of 1-7.6 nT and is governed mainly by eruption-driving and flux-content parameters. The impact-duration spread is 2.4-6.3 h and is controlled mostly by geometric size and expansion scaling, with additional sensitivity to the driving timescale. These results establish a quantitative link between EFR input uncertainties and the resulting spread in CME arrival and impact diagnostics, identifying the physical parameters that most strongly limit forecast precision at 1 AU. |
| title | Ensemble modeling of Coronal Mass Ejection dynamics and forecasts at 1 AU with a semi-analytic flux-rope model |
| topic | Solar and Stellar Astrophysics |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.04284 |