Copertina

Science discussions of retracted articles on Bluesky: public scrutiny or misinformation spreading?

Fuente: arXiv

Salvato in:

Dettagli Bibliografici
Autori principali:	Zheng, Er-Te, Fu, Hui-Zhen, Jiang, Xiaorui, Fang, Zhichao, Thelwall, Mike
Natura:	Preprint
Pubblicazione:	2026
Soggetti:	Digital Libraries Computers and Society Social and Information Networks
Accesso online:	Acceder al recurso
Tags:	Aggiungi Tag Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!

Documenti analoghi

How is science discussed on Bluesky?
di: Zheng, Er-Te, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Do male leading authors retract more articles than female leading authors?
di: Zheng, Er-Te, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Can news and social media attention reduce the influence of problematic research?
di: Zheng, Er-Te, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Can social media provide early warning of retraction? Evidence from critical tweets identified by human annotation and large language models
di: Zheng, Er-Te, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

Is OpenAlex Suitable for Research Quality Evaluation and Which Citation Indicator is Best?
di: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Will AI be overconfident about academic research findings when reliant on abstracts? (v1)
di: Thelwall, Mike
Pubblicazione: (2026)

Can social media provide early warning of retraction? Evidence from critical tweets identified by human annotation and large language models
di: Er‐Te Zheng, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Have LLM-associated terms increased in article full texts in all fields?
di: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

In which fields can ChatGPT detect journal article quality? An evaluation of REF2021 results
di: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

Evaluating the quality of published medical research with ChatGPT
di: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

In which fields do ChatGPT scores align better than citations with research quality?
di: Thelwall, Mike
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Quantitative Methods in Research Evaluation Citation Indicators, Altmetrics, and Artificial Intelligence
di: Thelwall, Mike
Pubblicazione: (2024)

Research quality evaluation by AI in the era of Large Language Models: Advantages, disadvantages, and systemic effects
di: Thelwall, Mike
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Prompt perturbation and fraction facilitation sometimes strengthen Large Language Model scores
di: Thelwall, Mike
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Do Large Language Models know Which Published Articles have been Retracted?
di: Thelwall, Mike
Pubblicazione: (2026)

Social media uptake of scientific journals: A comparison between X and WeChat
di: Cong, Ting, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Organisational accounts engaged in scholarly communication on Twitter: Patterns of presence, activity and engagement
di: Zahedi, Zohreh, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

Can ChatGPT evaluate research quality?
di: Thelwall, Mike
Pubblicazione: (2024)

Evaluating Research Quality with Large Language Models: An Analysis of ChatGPT's Effectiveness with Different Settings and Inputs
di: Thelwall, Mike
Pubblicazione: (2024)

Can Smaller Large Language Models Evaluate Research Quality?
di: Thelwall, Mike
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Designing large language model prompts to extract scores from messy text: A shared dataset and challenge
di: Thelwall, Mike
Pubblicazione: (2026)

Which stylistic features fool ChatGPT research evaluations?
di: Kousha, Kayvan, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

A Global South Strategy for Evaluating Research Value with ChatGPT
di: Nunkoo, Robin, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Research evaluation with ChatGPT: Is it age, country, length, or field biased?
di: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

Estimating the quality of academic books from their descriptions with ChatGPT
di: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Implicit and Explicit Research Quality Score Probabilities from ChatGPT
di: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Journal Quality Factors from ChatGPT: More meaningful than Impact Factors?
di: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

Can Large Language Models Evaluate Grant Proposal Quality? Revisiting the Wennerås and Wold Peer Review Data
di: Sandström, Ulf, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

How much are LLMs changing the language of academic papers after ChatGPT? A multi-database and full text analysis
di: Kousha, Kayvan, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Consensus and fragmentation in academic publication preferences
di: Van Buskirk, Ian, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

Which international co-authorships produce higher quality journal articles?
di: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2022)

Public interest in science or bots? Selective amplification of scientific articles on Twitter
di: Rahman, Ashiqur, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

Adaptability and the Pivot Penalty in Science and Technology
di: Hill, Ryan, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2021)

Atlas of Science Collaboration, 1971-2020
di: Okamura, Keisuke
Pubblicazione: (2023)

Can Small and Reasoning Large Language Models Score Journal Articles for Research Quality and Do Averaging and Few-shot Help?
di: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Evaluating the Predictive Capacity of ChatGPT for Academic Peer Review Outcomes Across Multiple Platforms
di: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

Assessing the societal influence of academic research with ChatGPT: Impact case study evaluations
di: Kousha, Kayvan, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

Can ChatGPT be a good follower of academic paradigms? Research quality evaluations in conflicting areas of sociology
di: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Can ChatGPT evaluate research environments? Evidence from REF2021
di: Kousha, Kayvan, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Are there stars in Bluesky? A comparative exploratory analysis of altmetric mentions between X and Bluesky
di: Arroyo-Machado, Wenceslao, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)