Enregistré dans:
| Auteurs principaux: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Publié: |
2026
|
| Sujets: | |
| Accès en ligne: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.04858 |
| Tags: |
Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
|
| _version_ | 1866915983976824832 |
|---|---|
| author | Taubert, Marcus Skuta, Adam Loruenser, Thomas |
| author_facet | Taubert, Marcus Skuta, Adam Loruenser, Thomas |
| contents | As security demands increase, the importance of secure computation technologies grows, yet these technologies can often seem overwhelming to practitioners. Furthermore, many approaches focus only on a single technology, potentially overlooking superior alternatives. This work aims to address the issue of selecting the right technology for secure computation by presenting a comparative analysis of two highly relevant cryptographic methods and their software implementations, with a particular focus on machine learning. Firstly, we provide a theoretical summary and comparison of the secure computation paradigms of secure multi-party computation (SMPC) and fully homomorphic encryption (FHE). We outline the advantages and limitations of the protocols, as well as the relevant open-source software implementations. Secondly, we present the results of extensive benchmarking of the main software frameworks identified for machine learning operations and models. Regarding the current state of the art in FHE, we observe that it outperforms SMPC for regressions. Additionally it may be faster for simple dense networks using GPUs or Hybrid Models. Conversely, SMPC showed superior performance for complex models such as CNNs. Our results should pave the way for more technology-agnostic benchmarking of secure computation technologies for machine learning, providing guidance for practitioners looking to adopt these technologies. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2605_04858 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | A Pragmatic Comparison of Cryptographic Computation Technologies for Machine Learning Taubert, Marcus Skuta, Adam Loruenser, Thomas Cryptography and Security As security demands increase, the importance of secure computation technologies grows, yet these technologies can often seem overwhelming to practitioners. Furthermore, many approaches focus only on a single technology, potentially overlooking superior alternatives. This work aims to address the issue of selecting the right technology for secure computation by presenting a comparative analysis of two highly relevant cryptographic methods and their software implementations, with a particular focus on machine learning. Firstly, we provide a theoretical summary and comparison of the secure computation paradigms of secure multi-party computation (SMPC) and fully homomorphic encryption (FHE). We outline the advantages and limitations of the protocols, as well as the relevant open-source software implementations. Secondly, we present the results of extensive benchmarking of the main software frameworks identified for machine learning operations and models. Regarding the current state of the art in FHE, we observe that it outperforms SMPC for regressions. Additionally it may be faster for simple dense networks using GPUs or Hybrid Models. Conversely, SMPC showed superior performance for complex models such as CNNs. Our results should pave the way for more technology-agnostic benchmarking of secure computation technologies for machine learning, providing guidance for practitioners looking to adopt these technologies. |
| title | A Pragmatic Comparison of Cryptographic Computation Technologies for Machine Learning |
| topic | Cryptography and Security |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.04858 |