_version_ 1866911653142986752
author Luo, Wei
Lu, Yiting
Li, Xin
Li, Haoran
Guan, Fengbin
Gao, Chen
Jin, Xin
Li, Yong
Chen, Zhibo
Wu, Sijing
Fu, Kang
Li, Yunhao
Xiao, Ziang
Duan, Huiyu
Liu, Jing
Hu, Qiang
Min, Xiongkuo
Zhai, Guangtao
Sun, Manxi
Guo, Zixuan
Li, Yun
Chen, Ziyang
Tsukada, Manabu
Li, Zhengyang
Du, Zhenglin
Wen, Yi
Jiao, Licheng
Liu, Fang
Li, Lingling
Ren, Yiwen
Song, Zhilong
Chen, Dubing
Zhou, Yucheng
Yan, Tianyi
Zheng, Huan
author_facet Luo, Wei
Lu, Yiting
Li, Xin
Li, Haoran
Guan, Fengbin
Gao, Chen
Jin, Xin
Li, Yong
Chen, Zhibo
Wu, Sijing
Fu, Kang
Li, Yunhao
Xiao, Ziang
Duan, Huiyu
Liu, Jing
Hu, Qiang
Min, Xiongkuo
Zhai, Guangtao
Sun, Manxi
Guo, Zixuan
Li, Yun
Chen, Ziyang
Tsukada, Manabu
Li, Zhengyang
Du, Zhenglin
Wen, Yi
Jiao, Licheng
Liu, Fang
Li, Lingling
Ren, Yiwen
Song, Zhilong
Chen, Dubing
Zhou, Yucheng
Yan, Tianyi
Zheng, Huan
contents This paper reports on the LoViF 2026 PhyScore challenge, a competition on holistic quality assessment of world-model-generated videos across both 2D and 4D generation settings. The challenge is motivated by a central gap in current evaluation practice: perceptual quality alone is insufficient to judge whether generated dynamics are physically plausible, temporally coherent, and consistent with input conditions. Participants are required to build a metric that jointly predicts four dimensions, i.e., Video Quality, Physical Realism, Condition-Video Alignment, and Temporal Consistency. Depart from that, participants also need to localize physical anomaly timestamps for fine-grained diagnosis. The benchmark dataset contains 1,554 videos generated by seven representative world generative models, organized into three tracks (text-2D, image-to-4D, and video-to-4D) and spanning 26 categories. These categories explicitly cover physics-relevant scenarios, including dynamics, optics, and thermodynamics, together with diverse real-world and creative content. To ensure label reliability, scores and anomaly timestamps are produced through trained human annotation with an additional automated quality-control pass. Evaluation is based on both score prediction and anomaly localization, with a composite protocol that combines TimeStamp_IOU and SRCC/PLCC. This report summarizes the challenge design and provides method-level insights from submitted solutions.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2605_05187
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle LoViF 2026 The First Challenge on Holistic Quality Assessment for 4D World Model (PhyScore)
Luo, Wei
Lu, Yiting
Li, Xin
Li, Haoran
Guan, Fengbin
Gao, Chen
Jin, Xin
Li, Yong
Chen, Zhibo
Wu, Sijing
Fu, Kang
Li, Yunhao
Xiao, Ziang
Duan, Huiyu
Liu, Jing
Hu, Qiang
Min, Xiongkuo
Zhai, Guangtao
Sun, Manxi
Guo, Zixuan
Li, Yun
Chen, Ziyang
Tsukada, Manabu
Li, Zhengyang
Du, Zhenglin
Wen, Yi
Jiao, Licheng
Liu, Fang
Li, Lingling
Ren, Yiwen
Song, Zhilong
Chen, Dubing
Zhou, Yucheng
Yan, Tianyi
Zheng, Huan
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
This paper reports on the LoViF 2026 PhyScore challenge, a competition on holistic quality assessment of world-model-generated videos across both 2D and 4D generation settings. The challenge is motivated by a central gap in current evaluation practice: perceptual quality alone is insufficient to judge whether generated dynamics are physically plausible, temporally coherent, and consistent with input conditions. Participants are required to build a metric that jointly predicts four dimensions, i.e., Video Quality, Physical Realism, Condition-Video Alignment, and Temporal Consistency. Depart from that, participants also need to localize physical anomaly timestamps for fine-grained diagnosis. The benchmark dataset contains 1,554 videos generated by seven representative world generative models, organized into three tracks (text-2D, image-to-4D, and video-to-4D) and spanning 26 categories. These categories explicitly cover physics-relevant scenarios, including dynamics, optics, and thermodynamics, together with diverse real-world and creative content. To ensure label reliability, scores and anomaly timestamps are produced through trained human annotation with an additional automated quality-control pass. Evaluation is based on both score prediction and anomaly localization, with a composite protocol that combines TimeStamp_IOU and SRCC/PLCC. This report summarizes the challenge design and provides method-level insights from submitted solutions.
title LoViF 2026 The First Challenge on Holistic Quality Assessment for 4D World Model (PhyScore)
topic Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.05187