Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Preprint |
| Publicado: |
2026
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.05435 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| _version_ | 1866915986617139200 |
|---|---|
| author | DeLise, Alexander Dexter, Nick |
| author_facet | DeLise, Alexander Dexter, Nick |
| contents | Generative compressed sensing uses the range of a pretrained generator as a nonlinear model for recovering structured signals from limited measurements. We study a conditional version of this problem for image recovery from subsampled Fourier measurements using prompt-conditioned generative models. Our framework separates two roles of conditioning: the prompt used to design the sampling distribution and the prompt used to define the recovery model. For ReLU and Lipschitz conditional generators, we prove stable recovery bounds showing that prompt-matched Christoffel sampling retains the same Christoffel complexity constant as existing near-optimal generative compressed sensing theory, while prompt mismatch incurs an explicit compatibility penalty. Experiments with Stable Diffusion show that prompts meaningfully reshape Christoffel sampling distributions and influence image recovery. Overall, our results suggest that prompts should be treated as design variables with distinct effects on sensing, approximation, and recovery. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2605_05435 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Active Learning for Conditional Generative Compressed Sensing DeLise, Alexander Dexter, Nick Machine Learning Numerical Analysis 68T07, 94A20, 65J22, 41A46, 68U10 I.2.6; I.4.5; G.1.6; G.3 Generative compressed sensing uses the range of a pretrained generator as a nonlinear model for recovering structured signals from limited measurements. We study a conditional version of this problem for image recovery from subsampled Fourier measurements using prompt-conditioned generative models. Our framework separates two roles of conditioning: the prompt used to design the sampling distribution and the prompt used to define the recovery model. For ReLU and Lipschitz conditional generators, we prove stable recovery bounds showing that prompt-matched Christoffel sampling retains the same Christoffel complexity constant as existing near-optimal generative compressed sensing theory, while prompt mismatch incurs an explicit compatibility penalty. Experiments with Stable Diffusion show that prompts meaningfully reshape Christoffel sampling distributions and influence image recovery. Overall, our results suggest that prompts should be treated as design variables with distinct effects on sensing, approximation, and recovery. |
| title | Active Learning for Conditional Generative Compressed Sensing |
| topic | Machine Learning Numerical Analysis 68T07, 94A20, 65J22, 41A46, 68U10 I.2.6; I.4.5; G.1.6; G.3 |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.05435 |