I see artifacts: ICA-based EEG artifact removal does not improve deep network decoding across three BCI tasks

Fuente: arXiv
Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kang, Taeho, Chen, Yiyu, Wallraven, Christian
Formato: Preprint
Publicado: 2026
Materias:
Acceso en línea:
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
_version_ 1866911656976580608
author Kang, Taeho
Chen, Yiyu
Wallraven, Christian
author_facet Kang, Taeho
Chen, Yiyu
Wallraven, Christian
contents In this paper, we conduct a detailed investigation on the effect of independent component (IC)-based noise rejection methods in neural network classifier-based decoding of electroencephalography (EEG) data in different task datasets. We apply a pipeline matrix of two popular different independent component (IC) decomposition methods (Infomax and Adaptive Mixture Independent Component Analysis (AMICA)) with three different component rejection strategies (none, ICLabel, and multiple artifact rejection algorithm [MARA]) on three different EEG datasets (motor imagery, long-term memory formation, and visual memory). We cross-validate processed data from each pipeline with three architectures commonly used for EEG classification (two convolutional neural networks and one long short-term memory-based model. We compare decoding performances on within-participant and within-dataset levels.Our results show that the benefit from using IC-based noise rejection for decoding analyses is at best minor, as component-rejected data did not show consistently better performance than data without rejections; especially given the significant computational resources required for independent component analysis (ICA) computations.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2605_06018
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle I see artifacts: ICA-based EEG artifact removal does not improve deep network decoding across three BCI tasks
Kang, Taeho
Chen, Yiyu
Wallraven, Christian
Human-Computer Interaction
In this paper, we conduct a detailed investigation on the effect of independent component (IC)-based noise rejection methods in neural network classifier-based decoding of electroencephalography (EEG) data in different task datasets. We apply a pipeline matrix of two popular different independent component (IC) decomposition methods (Infomax and Adaptive Mixture Independent Component Analysis (AMICA)) with three different component rejection strategies (none, ICLabel, and multiple artifact rejection algorithm [MARA]) on three different EEG datasets (motor imagery, long-term memory formation, and visual memory). We cross-validate processed data from each pipeline with three architectures commonly used for EEG classification (two convolutional neural networks and one long short-term memory-based model. We compare decoding performances on within-participant and within-dataset levels.Our results show that the benefit from using IC-based noise rejection for decoding analyses is at best minor, as component-rejected data did not show consistently better performance than data without rejections; especially given the significant computational resources required for independent component analysis (ICA) computations.
title I see artifacts: ICA-based EEG artifact removal does not improve deep network decoding across three BCI tasks
topic Human-Computer Interaction
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.06018