From Assistance to Agency: Rethinking Autonomy and Control in CI/CD Pipelines

Fuente: arXiv
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Barnes, Marcus Emmanuel, Ghaleb, Taher A., Hassan, Safwat
Format: Preprint
Published: 2026
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866910200281169920
author Barnes, Marcus Emmanuel
Ghaleb, Taher A.
Hassan, Safwat
author_facet Barnes, Marcus Emmanuel
Ghaleb, Taher A.
Hassan, Safwat
contents AI agents are assuming active roles in Continuous Integration and Continuous Deployment (CI/CD) workflows, yet the research community lacks a shared vocabulary for describing what it means for CI/CD to be agentic, how much decision authority is delegated, and where control should reside. This paper presents a vision of agentic CI/CD in which the central challenge is not improving task performance but designing authority transfer, defined as the delegation of operational decisions from human-controlled pipelines to agent systems under specified constraints and recourse mechanisms. To structure this argument, we introduce a distinction between data-plane authority (localized interventions such as patch generation and test reruns) and control-plane authority (modifications to pipeline configuration, deployment policies, and approval gates). Drawing on research prototypes and industrial platforms, we show that current systems operate mainly at the data plane under bounded autonomy, with safety achieved through surrounding governance infrastructure rather than intrinsic agent guarantees. We identify three recurring patterns: constrained autonomy as the dominant design, external governance as the primary safety mechanism, and a widening gap between deployment momentum and evaluation methodology. We propose a research agenda in which control-plane safety and governance mechanisms represent the most urgent open problem, followed by formalization of autonomy boundaries, evaluation frameworks, and human--agent coordination.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2605_07062
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle From Assistance to Agency: Rethinking Autonomy and Control in CI/CD Pipelines
Barnes, Marcus Emmanuel
Ghaleb, Taher A.
Hassan, Safwat
Software Engineering
Artificial Intelligence
D.2.9; I.2.11
AI agents are assuming active roles in Continuous Integration and Continuous Deployment (CI/CD) workflows, yet the research community lacks a shared vocabulary for describing what it means for CI/CD to be agentic, how much decision authority is delegated, and where control should reside. This paper presents a vision of agentic CI/CD in which the central challenge is not improving task performance but designing authority transfer, defined as the delegation of operational decisions from human-controlled pipelines to agent systems under specified constraints and recourse mechanisms. To structure this argument, we introduce a distinction between data-plane authority (localized interventions such as patch generation and test reruns) and control-plane authority (modifications to pipeline configuration, deployment policies, and approval gates). Drawing on research prototypes and industrial platforms, we show that current systems operate mainly at the data plane under bounded autonomy, with safety achieved through surrounding governance infrastructure rather than intrinsic agent guarantees. We identify three recurring patterns: constrained autonomy as the dominant design, external governance as the primary safety mechanism, and a widening gap between deployment momentum and evaluation methodology. We propose a research agenda in which control-plane safety and governance mechanisms represent the most urgent open problem, followed by formalization of autonomy boundaries, evaluation frameworks, and human--agent coordination.
title From Assistance to Agency: Rethinking Autonomy and Control in CI/CD Pipelines
topic Software Engineering
Artificial Intelligence
D.2.9; I.2.11
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.07062