Metaphors as Scaffolds: Spatial, Embodied, Fantastical, and Relational Framings for Youth Usable Privacy Design
Fuente:
arXiv
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2026
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866917527627497472 |
|---|---|
| author | Kim, JaeWon Hiniker, Alexis |
| author_facet | Kim, JaeWon Hiniker, Alexis |
| contents | Drawing on observations from three prior studies with youth aged 13--24, we examine how metaphor shapes the way young people reason about privacy and imagine privacy designs beyond settings panels. Spatial metaphors made complex permission structures feel like movement through rooms and the placing of objects within them. Embodied metaphors gave youth language for shared norms around presence, access, and intrusion. Fantastical metaphors turned privacy work into something playful and discoverable, prompting more generative and granular design ideas. Relational metaphors, however, exposed the same mechanism's downside: when a system feels like a loyal companion while data passes through an institution, youth may disclose more than they otherwise would. This provocation does not argue that some metaphors are good and others bad. It argues that metaphors meaningfully scaffold both the design process and the user experience of usable privacy, and that choosing one is an ethical decision about which norms a privacy interface makes easy to see, imagine, and act on. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2605_07185 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Metaphors as Scaffolds: Spatial, Embodied, Fantastical, and Relational Framings for Youth Usable Privacy Design Kim, JaeWon Hiniker, Alexis Human-Computer Interaction Drawing on observations from three prior studies with youth aged 13--24, we examine how metaphor shapes the way young people reason about privacy and imagine privacy designs beyond settings panels. Spatial metaphors made complex permission structures feel like movement through rooms and the placing of objects within them. Embodied metaphors gave youth language for shared norms around presence, access, and intrusion. Fantastical metaphors turned privacy work into something playful and discoverable, prompting more generative and granular design ideas. Relational metaphors, however, exposed the same mechanism's downside: when a system feels like a loyal companion while data passes through an institution, youth may disclose more than they otherwise would. This provocation does not argue that some metaphors are good and others bad. It argues that metaphors meaningfully scaffold both the design process and the user experience of usable privacy, and that choosing one is an ethical decision about which norms a privacy interface makes easy to see, imagine, and act on. |
| title | Metaphors as Scaffolds: Spatial, Embodied, Fantastical, and Relational Framings for Youth Usable Privacy Design |
| topic | Human-Computer Interaction |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.07185 |